from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.metrics import silhouette_samples, silhouette_score, plot_confusion_matrix
import matplotlib.cm as cm
# Familiar packages for plotting, data manipulation, and numeric functions
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Have plots appear in notebook
%matplotlib inline
# Default plot params
plt.style.use('seaborn')
cmap = 'tab10'
from test_scripts.test_class import Test
test = Test()
# Read in data
X = test.load_ind('X.pkl')
y = test.load_ind('y.pkl')
-
For k from 2 to 10:
- fit a
KMeans
object withk
clusters andrandom_state
301 - save the sum of squared distance for all points to the centroids of their respective cluster in a list
- Hint: read the docs
- fit a
-
Graph the values you saved on the
Y axis
w/k
on theX axis
In general, what type of information do you diagnose from an Elbow Curve plot?
For this specific graph, what conclusions can you make?
#Your work here
Use the code below to create a silhouette plot for k
from 2 to 8
What conclusions can you draw?
What implications does this have for interpreting the Elbow Curve graph?
def silhouette_plot(n_clusters, cluster_labels, X):
# Create a subplot with 1 row and 2 columns
fig, (ax1) = plt.subplots(1)
fig.set_size_inches(18, 7)
# The 1st subplot is the silhouette plot
# The silhouette coefficient can range from -1, 1 but in this example all
# lie within [-0.1, 1]
ax1.set_xlim([-0.1, 1])
# The (n_clusters+1)*10 is for inserting blank space between silhouette
# plots of individual clusters, to demarcate them clearly.
ax1.set_ylim([0, len(X) + (n_clusters + 1) * 10])
# The silhouette_score gives the average value for all the samples.
# This gives a perspective into the density and separation of the formed
# clusters
silhouette_avg = silhouette_score(X, cluster_labels)
print("For n_clusters =", n_clusters,
"The average silhouette_score is :", silhouette_avg)
# Compute the silhouette scores for each sample
sample_silhouette_values = silhouette_samples(X, cluster_labels)
y_lower = 10
for i in range(n_clusters):
# Aggregate the silhouette scores for samples belonging to
# cluster i, and sort them
ith_cluster_silhouette_values = \
sample_silhouette_values[cluster_labels == i]
ith_cluster_silhouette_values.sort()
size_cluster_i = ith_cluster_silhouette_values.shape[0]
y_upper = y_lower + size_cluster_i
color = cm.nipy_spectral(float(i) / n_clusters)
ax1.fill_betweenx(np.arange(y_lower, y_upper),
0, ith_cluster_silhouette_values,
facecolor=color, edgecolor=color, alpha=0.7)
# Label the silhouette plots with their cluster numbers at the middle
ax1.text(-0.05, y_lower + 0.5 * size_cluster_i, str(i))
# Compute the new y_lower for next plot
y_lower = y_upper + 10 # 10 for the 0 samples
ax1.set_title("The silhouette plot for the various clusters.")
ax1.set_xlabel("The silhouette coefficient values")
ax1.set_ylabel("Cluster label")
# The vertical line for average silhouette score of all the values
ax1.axvline(x=silhouette_avg, color="red", linestyle="--")
ax1.set_yticks([]) # Clear the yaxis labels / ticks
ax1.set_xticks([-0.1, 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1])
plt.show()
# Your work here
The data was artificially generated, so the "actual" centroids are known.
A variable y
has been loaded and contains the "actual" centroids.
Compare your computed centroids against the actual ones.
Can you manipulate the X data in such a way to generate closer centroids with KMeans?