Mock http requests made using fetch (or isomorphic-fetch). As well as shorthand methods for the simplest use cases, it offers a flexible API for customising all aspects of mocking behaviour.
npm install fetch-mock
then require('fetch-mock')
in most environments.
Troubleshooting and alternative installation, V4 changelog
require('fetch-mock')
exports a singleton with the following methods
Replaces fetch()
with a stub which records its calls, grouped by route, and optionally returns a mocked Response
object or passes the call through to fetch()
. Calls to .mock()
can be chained.
matcher
[required]: Condition for selecting which requests to mock Accepts any of the followingstring
: Either an exact url to match e.g. 'http://www.site.com/page.html' or, if the string begins with a^
, the string following the^
must begin the url e.g. '^http://www.site.com' would match 'http://www.site.com' or 'http://www.site.com/page.html'RegExp
: A regular expression to test the url againstFunction(url, opts)
: A function (returning a Boolean) that is passed the url and optsfetch()
is called with (or, iffetch()
was called with one, theRequest
instance)
method
[optional]: only matches requests using this http methodresponse
[required]: Configures the http response returned by the mock. Can take any of the following values (or be aPromise
for any of them, enabling full control when testing race conditions etc.)number
: Creates a response with this statusstring
: Creates a 200 response with the string as the response bodyobject
: As long as the object does not contain any of the properties below it is converted into a json string and returned as the body of a 200 response. If any of the properties below are defined it is used to configure aResponse
objectbody
: Set the response body (string
orobject
)status
: Set the response status (defaut200
)headers
: Set the response headers. (object
)throws
: If this property is present then aPromise
rejected with the value ofthrows
is returnedsendAsJson
: This property determines whether or not the request body should be JSON.stringified before being sent (defaults to true).
Function(url, opts)
: A function that is passed the url and optsfetch()
is called with and that returns any of the responses listed above
Restores fetch()
to its unstubbed state and clears all data recorded for its calls
Calls restore()
internally then calls mock()
. This allows you to put some generic calls to mock()
in a beforeEach()
while retaining the flexibility to vary the responses for some tests. reMock()
can be chained.
Clears all data recorded for fetch()
's calls
For the methods below matcher
, if given, should be either the name of a route (see advanced usage below) or equal to matcher.toString()
for any unnamed route
Returns an object {matched: [], unmatched: []}
containing arrays of all calls to fetch, grouped by whether fetch-mock matched them or not. If matcher
is specified then only calls to fetch matching that route are returned.
Returns a Boolean indicating whether fetch was called and a route was matched. If matcher
is specified it only returns true
if that particular route was matched.
Returns the arguments for the last matched call to fetch
Returns the url for the last matched call to fetch
Returns the options for the last matched call to fetch
fetchMock
.mock('http://domain1', 200)
.mock('http://domain2', 'PUT', {
affectedRecords: 1
});
myModule.onlyCallDomain2()
.then(() => {
expect(fetchMock.called('http://domain2')).to.be.true;
expect(fetchMock.called('http://domain1')).to.be.false;
expect(fetchMock.calls().unmatched.length).to.equal(0);
expect(JSON.parse(fetchMock.lastUrl('http://domain2'))).to.equal('http://domain2/endpoint');
expect(JSON.parse(fetchMock.lastOptions('http://domain2').body)).to.deep.equal({prop: 'val'});
fetchMock.restore();
})
Use a configuration object to define a route to mock.
name
[optional]: A unique string naming the route. Used to subsequently retrieve references to the calls, grouped by name. If not specified defaults tomatcher.toString()
Note: If a non-unique name is provided no error will be thrown (because names are optional, so auto-generated ones may legitimately clash)method
[optional]: http methodmatcher
[required]: as specified aboveresponse
[required]: as specified above
Pass in an array of route configuration objects
Pass in an object containing more complex config for fine grained control over every aspect of mocking behaviour. May have the following properties
routes
: Either a single route config object or an array of them (see above).greed
: Determines how the mock handles unmatched requests- 'none': all unmatched calls get passed through to
fetch()
- 'bad': all unmatched calls result in a rejected promise
- 'good': all unmatched calls result in a resolved promise with a 200 status
- 'none': all unmatched calls get passed through to
When using isomorphic-fetch or node-fetch ideally fetch
should be added as a global. If not possible to do so you can still use fetch-mock in combination with mockery or similar in nodejs. To use fetch-mock with with mockery you may use this function to prevent fetch-mock trying to mock the function globally.
func
Optional reference tofetch
(or any other function you may want to substitute forfetch
in your tests). This will probably have zero effect on your tests unless you are deliberately using thegreed: 'none'
config option to let some requests pass through to the originalfetch
implementation
First of all, consider whether you could just use fetch
as a global. Here are 3 reasons why this is a good idea:
- The
fetch
standard defines it as a global (and in some cases it won't work unless bound towindow
), so to write isomorphic code it's probably best to stick to this pattern isomorphic-fetch
takes care of installing it as a global in nodejs or the browser, so there's no effort on your part to do so.fetch-mock
is primarily designed to work withfetch
as a global and your experience of using it will be far more straightforward if you follow this pattern
Still not convinced?
In that case fetchMock.fetchMock
(or [deprecated] call getMock()
) gives you access to the mock implementation of fetch
which you can pass in to a mock loading library such as mockery
var fetch = require('node-fetch');
var fetchMock = require('fetch-mock');
var mockery = require('mockery');
it('should make a request', function (done) {
mockery.registerMock('node-fetch', fetchMock.fetchMock);
fetchMock.mock('http://domain.com/', 200)
const myModule = require('./src/my-mod'); // this module requires node-fetch and assigns to a variable
// test code goes in here
mockery.deregisterMock('fetch');
done();
});
If using a mock loading library such as mockery
, are you requiring the module you're testing after registering fetch-mock
with the mock loader? You probably should be (Example incorrect usage). If you're using ES6 import
it may not be possible to do this without reverting to using require()
sometimes. I did warn you about not using fetch
as a global (...sigh)
- If your client-side code or tests do not use a loader that respects the browser field of package.json use
require('fetch-mock/es5/client')
. - If you need to use fetch-mock without commonjs, you can include the precompiled
node_modules/fetch-mock/es5/client-browserified.js
in a script tag. This loads fetch-mock into thefetchMock
global variable. - For server side tests running in nodejs 0.12 or lower use
require('fetch-mock/es5/server')
- In nodejs
require('isomorphic-fetch')
before any of your tests. - In the browser
require('isomorphic-fetch')
can also be used, but it may be easier tonpm install whatwg-fetch
(the module isomorphic-fetch is built around) and load./node_modules/whatwg-fetch/fetch.js
directly into the page, either in a script tag or by referencing it your test runner config
registerRoute()
andunregisterRoute()
have been removed to simplify the API. Since V3, calls to.mock()
can be chained, so persisting routes over a series of tests can easily be achieved by means of a beforeEach or helper e.g.
beforeEach(() => {
fetchMock
.mock('http://auth.service.com/user', 200)
.mock('http://mvt.service.com/session', {test1: true, test2: false})
});
afterEach(() => {
fetchMock.restore();
});
it('should be possible to augment persistent set of routes', () => {
fetchMock.mock('http://content.service.com/contentid', {content: 'blah blah'})
page.init();
expect(fetchMock.called('http://content.service.com/contentid')).to.be.true;
});
- Defining two routes with the same name will no longer throw an error (previous implementation was buggy anyway)
- Added
lastCall()
,lastUrl()
andlastOptions()
utilities