Issues
- 2
- 1
- 4
Question: cannot use reduce on array with initial = `[]` and no-array-mutation
#146 opened by tomsquest - 2
- 5
Split readme up into smaller files.
#142 opened by RebeccaStevens - 1
Warn about enumerations
#72 opened by ianbollinger - 1
Warn about array indexing
#71 opened by ianbollinger - 2
- 7
ESLint support
#139 opened by ulrichb - 1
How to disable semicolon insertion?
#144 opened by g5becks - 2
rule requires type information.
#143 opened by binjospookie - 0
Some tests fail with node v12.
#141 opened by RebeccaStevens - 0
Class member mutation in constructors is seen as initialization when it may not be. [no-object-mutation]
#126 opened by RebeccaStevens - 7
ignore-suffix
#99 opened by dolanmiu - 4
- 1
ignore-precise
#114 opened by WillSquire - 2
Take `this`-access into account for `ignore-prefix`
#101 opened by ulrichb - 3
- 0
[readonly-array] Nested arrays aren't allowed to be mutable with ignore-prefix.
#132 opened by RebeccaStevens - 0
- 3
Add support for new `readonly` keyword syntax for arrays and types in typescript 3.4
#129 opened by jonaskello - 4
[Discussion] no-array-mutation - Allow mutation of arrays returned from functions?
#92 opened by RebeccaStevens - 5
Ban Object.assign mutation
#112 opened by mmkal - 0
Rule "readonly-array" with option "ignore-return-type" doesn't work with union, intersection and conditional types.
#124 opened by RebeccaStevens - 0
Rule "readonly-array" with option "ignore-return-type" doesn't work with tuples.
#121 opened by RebeccaStevens - 3
Rule "readonly-array" with option "ignore-return-type" doesn't work with generic parameters.
#117 opened by yxliang01 - 2
no-object-mutation conflicts with setters
#119 opened by ghs - 8
Suggestion: make no-throw more restrictive
#115 opened by sbdchd - 1
readonly-keyword fixer adds the `readonly` modifier in the wrong place for decorated class properties
#81 opened by clarkdave - 0
no-object-mutation conflicts with module.exports
#111 opened by eh-am - 0
- 7
- 1
[Discussion] Are there any compile-time performance costs to have `readonly` everywhere?
#93 opened by kirillgroshkov - 1
TSC enforces readonly
#108 opened by urbanhop - 1
Migrate to travis-ci.com
#106 opened by jonaskello - 0
`ignore-return-type` option for the `readonly-array` doesn't catch method declarations
#97 opened by RebeccaStevens - 1
readonly-array ignore return type.
#82 opened by RebeccaStevens - 2
- 9
- 2
Enable all rules in the preset
#66 opened by listepo-alterpost - 1
Proposal: add new no-throw and/or no-try-catch rules (functional style rules)
#86 opened by RebeccaStevens - 0
`"readonly-array": [true, "ignore-local"]` should not affect interface definitions
#87 opened by geon - 2
- 0
Never mind :-)
#83 opened by jonaskello - 1
readonly-keyword does not seem to catch object declarations in parameters or return type
#68 opened by jonaskello - 2
no-class does not catch class expressions
#65 opened by jonaskello - 2
ignore 'await' in prefix?
#76 opened by mmkal - 1
Mutable prefix for indexer interfaces
#75 opened by jonaskello - 1
- 6