A .NET Port of the Scientist library for carefully refactoring critical paths.
To give it a twirl, use NuGet to install: Install-Package Scientist
Let's pretend you're changing the way you handle permissions in a large web app. Tests can help guide your refactoring, but you really want to compare the current and refactored behaviors under load.
using GitHub;
...
public bool CanAccess(IUser user)
{
return Scientist.Science<bool>("widget-permissions", experiment =>
{
experiment.Use(() => IsCollaborator(user)); // old way
experiment.Try(() => HasAccess(user)); // new way
}); // returns the control value
}Wrap a Use block around the code's original behavior, and wrap Try around the new behavior. Invoking Scientist.Science<T> will always return whatever the Use block returns, but it does a bunch of stuff behind the scenes:
- It decides whether or not to run the
Tryblock, - Randomizes the order in which
UseandTryblocks are run, - Measures the durations of all behaviors,
- Compares the result of
Tryto the result ofUse, - Swallows (but records) any exceptions raised in the
Tryblock, and - Publishes all this information.
The Use block is called the control. The Try block is called the candidate.
If you don't declare any Try blocks, none of the Scientist machinery is invoked and the control value is always returned.
What good is science if you can't publish your results?
By default results are published in an in-memory publisher. To override this behavior, create your own implementation of IResultPublisher:
public class MyResultPublisher : IResultPublisher
{
public Task Publish<T, TClean>(Result<T, TClean> result)
{
Logger.Debug($"Publishing results for experiment '{result.ExperimentName}'");
Logger.Debug($"Result: {(result.Matched ? "MATCH" : "MISMATCH")}");
Logger.Debug($"Control value: {result.Control.Value}");
Logger.Debug($"Control duration: {result.Control.Duration}");
foreach (var observation in result.Candidates)
{
Logger.Debug($"Candidate name: {observation.Name}");
Logger.Debug($"Candidate value: {observation.Value}");
Logger.Debug($"Candidate duration: {observation.Duration}");
}
if (result.Mismatched)
{
// saved mismatched experiments to DB
DbHelpers.SaveExperimentResults(result);
}
return Task.FromResult(0);
}
}Then set Scientist to use it before running the experiments:
Scientist.ResultPublisher = new MyResultPublisher();As of v1.0.2, A IResultPublisher can also be wrapped in FireAndForgetResultPublisher so that result publishing avoids any delays in running experiments and is delegated to another thread:
Scientist.ResultPublisher = new FireAndForgetResultPublisher(new MyResultPublisher(onPublisherException));Scientist compares control and candidate values using ==. To override this behavior, use Compare to define how to compare observed values instead:
public IUser GetCurrentUser(string hash)
{
return Scientist.Science<IUser>("get-current-user", experiment =>
{
experiment.Compare((x, y) => x.Name == y.Name);
experiment.Use(() => LookupUser(hash));
experiment.Try(() => RetrieveUser(hash));
});
}Results aren't very useful without some way to identify them. Use the AddContext method to add to the context for an experiment:
public IUser GetUserByName(string userName)
{
return Scientist.Science<IUser>("get-user-by-name", experiment =>
{
experiment.AddContext("username", userName);
experiment.Use(() => FindUser(userName));
experiment.Try(() => GetUser(userName));
});
}AddContext takes a string identifier and an object value, and adds them to an internal Dictionary. When you publish the results, you can access the context by using the Contexts property:
public class MyResultPublisher : IResultPublisher
{
public Task Publish<T, TClean>(Result<T, TClean> result)
{
foreach (var kvp in result.Contexts)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Key: {kvp.Key}, Value: {kvp.Value}");
}
return Task.FromResult(0);
}
}If an experiment requires expensive setup that should only occur when the experiment is going to be run, define it with the BeforeRun method:
public int DoSomethingExpensive()
{
return Scientist.Science<int>("expensive-but-worthwile", experiment =>
{
experiment.BeforeRun(() => ExpensiveSetup());
experiment.Use(() => TheOldWay());
experiment.Try(() => TheNewWay());
});
}Sometimes you don't want to store the full value for later analysis. For example, an experiment may return IUser instances, but when researching a mismatch, all you care about is the logins. You can define how to clean these values in an experiment:
public IUser GetUserByEmail(string emailAddress)
{
return Scientist.Science<IUser, string>("get-user-by-email", experiment =>
{
experiment.Use(() => OldApi.FindUserByEmail(emailAddress));
experiment.Try(() => NewApi.GetUserByEmail(emailAddress));
experiment.Clean(user => user.Login);
});
}And this cleaned value is available in the final published result:
public class MyResultPublisher : IResultPublisher
{
public Task Publish<T, TClean>(Result<T, TClean> result)
{
// result.Control.Value = <IUser object>
IUser user = (IUser)result.Control.Value;
Console.WriteLine($"Login from raw object: {user.Login}");
// result.Control.CleanedValue = "user name"
Console.WriteLine($"Login from cleaned object: {result.Control.CleanedValue}");
return Task.FromResult(0);
}
}During the early stages of an experiment, it's possible that some of your code will always generate a mismatch for reasons you know and understand but haven't yet fixed. Instead of these known cases always showing up as mismatches in your metrics or analysis, you can tell an experiment whether or not to ignore a mismatch using the Ignore method. You may include more than one block if needed:
public bool CanAccess(IUser user)
{
return Scientist.Science<bool>("widget-permissions", experiment =>
{
experiment.Use(() => IsCollaborator(user));
experiment.Try(() => HasAccess(user));
// user is staff, always an admin in the new system
experiment.Ignore((control, candidate) => user.IsStaff);
// new system doesn't handle unconfirmed users yet
experiment.Ignore((control, candidate) => control && !candidate && !user.ConfirmedEmail);
});
}The ignore blocks are only called if the values don't match. If one observation raises an exception and the other doesn't, it's always considered a mismatch. If both observations raise different exceptions, that is also considered a mismatch.
Sometimes you don't want an experiment to run. Say, disabling a new codepath for anyone who isn't staff. You can disable an experiment by setting a RunIf block. If this returns false, the experiment will merely return the control value. Otherwise, it defers to the global Scientist.Enabled method.
public decimal GetUserStatistic(IUser user)
{
return Scientist.Science<decimal>("new-statistic-calculation", experiment =>
{
experiment.RunIf(() => user.IsTestSubject);
experiment.Use(() => CalculateStatistic(user));
experiment.Try(() => NewCalculateStatistic(user));
});
}As a scientist, you know it's always important to be able to turn your experiment off, lest it run amok and result in villagers with pitchforks on your doorstep. You can set a global switch to control whether or not experiments is enabled by using the Scientist.Enabled method.
int percentEnabled = 10;
Random rand = new Random();
Scientist.Enabled(() =>
{
return rand.Next(100) < percentEnabled;
});This code will be invoked for every method with an experiment every time, so be sensitive about its performance. For example, you can store an experiment in the database but wrap it in various levels of caching.
Scientist runs tasks synchronously by default. This can end up doubling (more or less) the time it takes the original method call to complete, depending on how many candidates are added and how long they take to run.
In cases where Scientist is used for production refactoring, for example, this ends up causing the calling method to return slower than before which may affect the performance of your original code. However, if the candidates can be run at the same time as the control method without affecting each other, then they can be run in parallel so the Scientist call will only take as long as the slowest task (plus a tiny bit of overhead):
await Scientist.ScienceAsync<int>(
"ExperimentName",
3, // number of tasks to run concurrently
experiment => {
experiment.Use(async () => await StartRunningSomething(myData));
experiment.Try(async () => await RunAtTheSameTimeAsTheControlMethod(myData));
experiment.Try(async () => await AlsoRunThisConcurrently(myData));
});As always when using async/await, don't forget to call .ConfigureAwait(false) where appropriate.
When running your test suite, it's helpful to know that the experimental results always match. To help with testing, Scientist has a ThrowOnMismatches property that can be set to true. Only do this in your test suite!
To throw on mismatches:
Scientist.Science<int>("ExperimentN", experiment =>
{
experiment.ThrowOnMismatches = true;
// ...
});Scientist will throw a MismatchException<T, TClean> exception if any observations don't match.
If an exception is thrown in any of Scientist's internal helpers like Compare, Enabled, or Ignore, the default behavior of Scientist is to re-throw that exception. Since this halts the experiment entirely, it's often a better idea to handle this error and continue so the experiment as a whole isn't canceled entirely:
Scientist.Science<int>("ExperimentCatch", experiment =>
{
experiment.Thrown((operation, exception) => InternalTracker.Track($"Science failure in ExperimentCatch: {operation}.", exception))
// ...
});The operations that may be handled here are:
Operation.Compare- an exception is raised in aCompareblockOperation.Enabled- an exception is raised in theEnabledblockOperation.Ignore- an exception is raised in anIgnoreblockOperation.Publish- an exception is raised while publishing resultsOperation.RunIf- an exception is raised in aRunIfblock
Because Enabled and RunIf determine when a candidate runs, it's impossible to guarantee that it will run every time. For this reason, Scientist is only safe for wrapping methods that aren't changing data.
When using Scientist, we've found it most useful to modify both the existing and new systems simultaneously anywhere writes happen, and verify the results at read time with Science. ThrowOnMismatches has also been useful to ensure that the correct data was written during tests, and reviewing published mismatches has helped us find any situations we overlooked with our production data at runtime. When writing to and reading from two systems, it's also useful to write some data reconciliation scripts to verify and clean up production data alongside any running experiments.
As your candidate behavior converges on the controls, you'll start thinking about removing an experiment and using the new behavior.
- If there are any ignore blocks, the candidate behavior is guaranteed to be different. If this is unacceptable, you'll need to remove the ignore blocks and resolve any ongoing mismatches in behavior until the observations match perfectly every time.
- When removing a read-behavior experiment, it's a good idea to keep any write-side duplication between an old and new system in place until well after the new behavior has been in production, in case you need to roll back.
Sometimes scientists just gotta do weird stuff. We understand.
Science is useful even when all you care about is the timing data or even whether or not a new code path blew up. If you have the ability to incrementally control how often an experiment runs via your Enabled method, you can use it to silently and carefully test new code paths and ignore the results altogether. You can do this by setting Ignore((x, y) => true), or for greater efficiency, Compare((x, y) => true).
This will still log mismatches if any exceptions are raised, but will disregard the values entirely.
It's not usually a good idea to try more than one alternative simultaneously. Behavior isn't guaranteed to be isolated and reporting + visualization get quite a bit harder. Still, it's sometimes useful.
To try more than one alternative at once, add names to some Try blocks:
public bool CanAccess(IUser user)
{
return Scientist.Science<bool>("widget-permissions", experiment =>
{
experiment.Use(() => IsCollaborator(user));
experiment.Try("api", () => HasAccess(user));
experiment.Try("raw-sql", () => HasAccessSql(user));
});
}Here are other implementations of Scientist available in different languages.
- github/scientist the original implementation of Scientist, in Ruby.
- daylerees/scientist for PHP by Dayle Rees.