Project Meeting, 2020-01-30
Closed this issue · 1 comments
Main/casual model estimations
-
The model diagnostics look really dicey, particularly the main, but I still have to add a couple of parameters (estimated, just not added to the models yet). SEE UPDATE IN COMMENT THREAD
-
Could not accounting for heterogeneity in dissolution rates contributes to this? I saw in the ARTNet paper that the dissolution rate varies by race/ethnicity and age
-
Currently focusing on the demographic inputs to the model, but will eventually add HIV diagnosis status too.
MCMLE procedure
-
Each time I run the models, the number of steps to convergence (when achieved) differs each time
- Natural, or am I missing where to set a random seed?
-
Despite the procedure's reporting convergence, many of the trace plots don't look great to me.
Estimates of ongoing partnerships
-
For the most part I'm getting the same or very similar answers, comparing them to the Epidemics paper, but I can't seem to get the ongoing/inactive partnership breakdowns within main and casual partnerships, respectively, to match.
-
A couple of small differences in how I analyzed that I don't think affect the estimates:
- Imputed age slightly differently
- Assigned partnership start date differently, but ongoing partnerships flagged based on
PARTXONGOING
andPARTXMAINONG
.
-
Perhaps I've assigned ongoingness incorrectly (see:
02b-DataCleaning-Long.R
)?
I had a stupid mistake in my target stat calculations for the nodefactors. Fixing that makes both look a lot better (see attached PDFs). Casual model still has obvious issues.
Just pushed the fix to the repo.
casl_netdx.pdf
main_netdx.pdf