Feature Request u&:(+`-) -> (+ x) u (- y)
dorshmil opened this issue · 1 comments
dorshmil commented
this format already implemented for the case of:
u&.(+`-)
and it will make sense that & and &:
behave the same way
HenryHRich commented
That gerund case requires that one side of the gerund is empty. The form
cannot be used for & because that would conflict with the u&n definition.
Henry Rich
…On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 4:26 AM shmil ***@***.***> wrote:
this format already implemented for the case of:
u&.(+`-)
and it will make sense that & and &:
behave the same way
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#185>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEKVAJ75WIMYBAW22SJFPM3YYAET7AVCNFSM6AAAAABETVW7BSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE4DGMZZGE3DEMY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>