master _vs_ released version

[utilum]

Is there a reason the README suggests installing from GitHub, and not from rubygems?

[jumph4x]

GitHub is always the latest.

…

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 5:44 AM utilum ***@***.***> wrote: Is there a reason the README suggests installing from GitHub, and not from rubygems? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#46>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGq6r-DcJ2yHIjgbbjFSWHvd0Hm2Ij4ks5tjNdAgaJpZM4TARQI> .

[utilum]

Thank you for responding and so quickly too.
I appreciate that GitHub master would always have the latest commits, just trying to better understand: All those conventions of semantic versioning, breaking changes, etc... they don't apply?

[jumph4x]

They apply but I'm not mega diligent about keeping up with them for something as rudimentary as a views helper gem. When you use a Github ref in your projects Gemfile, you're taking more responsibility for manually auditing versioning, since it's still present in the gem itself, just enforced quite the same way.

…

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:51 PM, utilum ***@***.***> wrote: Thank you for responding and so quickly too. I appreciate that GitHub master would always have the latest commits, just trying to better understand: All those conventions of semantic versioning, breaking changes, etc... they don't apply? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#46 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGq6jomluyEhHyTyWiyoHH2CFpqdcEmks5tjTtNgaJpZM4TARQI> .

-- Denis Ivanov www.downshiftlabs.com www.dapperdrift.com

[utilum]

Thank you for clarifying, and for the gem, of course.