Sloth

Introduction

Meet the easiest way to generate SLOs for Prometheus.

Sloth generates understandable, uniform and reliable Prometheus SLOs for any kind of service. Using a simple SLO spec that results in multiple metrics and multi window multi burn alerts.

At this moment Sloth is focused on Prometheus, however depending on the demand and complexity we may support other backends.

Features

Simple, maintainable and understandable SLO spec.
Reliable SLO metrics and alerts.
Based on Google SLO implementation and multi window multi burn alerts framework.
Autogenerates Prometheus SLI recording rules in different time windows.
Autogenerates Prometheus SLO metadata rules.
Autogenerates Prometheus SLO multi window multi burn alert rules (Page and warning).
SLO spec validation.
Customization of labels, disabling different type of alerts...
A single way (uniform) of creating SLOs across all different services and teams.
Automatic Grafana dashboard to see all your SLOs state.
Single binary and easy to use CLI.
Kubernetes (Prometheus-operator) support.
Kubernetes Controller/operator mode with CRDs.
Support different SLI types.
Support for SLI plugins
A library with common SLI plugins.

Get Sloth

Releases
Multi-arch Docker images
git clone git@github.com:slok/sloth.git && cd ./sloth && make build && ls -la ./bin

Getting started

Release the Sloth!

sloth generate -i ./examples/getting-started.yml

version: "prometheus/v1"
service: "myservice"
labels:
  owner: "myteam"
  repo: "myorg/myservice"
  tier: "2"
slos:
  # We allow failing (5xx and 429) 1 request every 1000 requests (99.9%).
  - name: "requests-availability"
    objective: 99.9
    description: "Common SLO based on availability for HTTP request responses."
    sli:
      events:
        error_query: sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count{job="myservice",code=~"(5..|429)"}[{{.window}}]))
        total_query: sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count{job="myservice"}[{{.window}}]))
    alerting:
      name: MyServiceHighErrorRate
      labels:
        category: "availability"
      annotations:
        # Overwrite default Sloth SLO alert summmary on ticket and page alerts.
        summary: "High error rate on 'myservice' requests responses"
      page_alert:
        labels:
          severity: pageteam
          routing_key: myteam
      ticket_alert:
        labels:
          severity: "slack"
          slack_channel: "#alerts-myteam"

This would be the result you would obtain from the above spec example.

How does it work

At this moment Sloth uses Prometheus rules to generate SLOs. Based on the generated recording and alert rules it creates a reliable and uniform SLO implementation:

1 Sloth spec -> Sloth -> N Prometheus rules

The Prometheus rules that Sloth generates can be explained in 3 categories:

SLIs: These rules are the base, they use the queries provided by the user to get a value used to show what is the error service level (availability). It creates multiple rules for different time windows, these different results will be used for the alerts.
Metadata: These are used as informative metrics, like the remaining error budget, the SLO objective percent... These are very handy for SLO visualization, e.g Grafana dashboard.
Alerts: These are the multiwindow-multiburn alerts that are based on the SLI rules.

Sloth will take the service level spec and for each SLO in the spec will create 3 rule groups with the above categories.

These rules will share the same metric name across SLOs. However the labels are the key to identify the different services, SLO... This is how we obtain a uniform way of describing all the SLOs across different teams and services.

To get all the available metric names created by Sloth, use this query:

count({sloth_id!=""}) by (__name__)

Usage

At this moment Sloth can work in two different modes:

As a CLI application: Load Sloth manifests, return generated SLOs.
As a Kubernetes controller: React on CRD events, generate SLOs and store them in Kubernetes.

CLI

generate will generate Prometheus rules in different formats based on the specs. This mode only needs the CLI so its very useful for GitOps, CI, scripts or as a CLI on your toolbox.

Currently there are two types of specs supported for generate command. Sloth will detect the input spec type and generate the output type accordingly:

Raw (Prometheus)

Check spec here: v1

Will generate the prometheus recording and alerting rules in Standard Prometheus YAML format.

Example:

$ sloth generate -i ./examples/home-wifi.yml -o /tmp/home-wifi.yml
INFO[0000] Generating from Prometheus spec               version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Multiwindow-multiburn alerts generated        slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLI recording rules generated                 rules=8 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Metadata recording rules generated            rules=7 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLO alert rules generated                     rules=2 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Multiwindow-multiburn alerts generated        slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLI recording rules generated                 rules=8 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Metadata recording rules generated            rules=7 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLO alert rules generated                     rules=2 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Prometheus rules written                      format=yaml groups=6 out=/tmp/home-wifi.yml svc=storage.IOWriter version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5

Kubernetes CRD (Prometheus-operator)

Check CRD here: v1

Will generate from a Sloth CRD spec into Prometheus-operator CRD rules. This generates the prometheus operator CRDs based on the Sloth CRD template.

Sloth CRD is NOT required in the cluster because it happens offline as a CLI. For controller/operator K8s flow, check next section
Prometheus operator Rule CRD is required in the cluster for the Sloth generated rules: Manifest

Example:

$ sloth generate -i ./examples/k8s-home-wifi.yml -o /tmp/k8s-home-wifi.yml
INFO[0000] Generating from Kubernetes Prometheus spec    version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Multiwindow-multiburn alerts generated        slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLI recording rules generated                 rules=8 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Metadata recording rules generated            rules=7 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLO alert rules generated                     rules=2 slo=home-wifi-good-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Multiwindow-multiburn alerts generated        slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLI recording rules generated                 rules=8 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] Metadata recording rules generated            rules=7 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5
INFO[0000] SLO alert rules generated                     rules=2 slo=home-wifi-risk-wifi-client-satisfaction svc=generate.prometheus.Service version=v0.1.0-43-g5715af5

Kubernetes Controller (Prometheus-operator)

kubernetes-controller command runs Sloth as a controller/operator that will react on sloth.slok.dev/v1/PrometheusServiceLevel CRD. The controller will create the required Prometheus-operator crd rules.

In the end the controller mode makes the same work as the CLI however integrates better with a native Kubernetes flow.

Sloth CRD is required in the cluster: Manifest
Prometheus operator Rule CRD is required in the cluster: Manifest

Example:

# Register Sloth CRD.
$ kubectl apply -f ./pkg/kubernetes/gen/crd/sloth.slok.dev_prometheusservicelevels.yaml

# Prometheus Operator Rules CRD is required.
# kubectl apply -f ./test/integration/crd/prometheus-operator-crd.yaml

# Run sloth controller.
$ kubectl create ns monitoring
$ kubectl apply -f ./deploy/kubernetes/sloth.yaml

# Deploy some SLOs.
$ kubectl apply -f ./examples/k8s-getting-started.yml

# Get CRs.
$ kubectl -n monitoring get slos
NAME                   SERVICE           DESIRED SLOS   READY SLOS   GEN OK   GEN AGE   AGE
sloth-slo-my-service   myservice         1              1            true     27s       27s

$ kubectl -n monitoring get prometheusrules
NAME                  AGE
sloth-slo-home-wifi   38s

Examples

Getting started: Getting started example.
K8s Getting started: Getting started example as a Kubernetes CRD.
Alerts disabled: Simple example that shows how to disable alerts.
K8s apiserver: Real example of SLOs for a Kubernetes Apiserver.
Home wifi: My home Ubiquti Wifi SLOs.
K8s Home wifi: Same as home-wifi but shows how to generate Prometheus-operator CRD from a Sloth CRD.
Raw Home wifi: Example showing how to use raw SLIs instead of the common events using the home-wifi example.
SLI Plugins: Example showing how to use SLI plugins.

The resulting generated SLOs are in examples/_gen.

SLI plugins

SLI plugins are small Go plugins (using Yaegi) that can be loaded on Sloth start.

These plugins can be refenreced as an SLI on the SLO specs and will return a raw SLI type.

Sloth will maintain a library with common SLI plugins that can be used on your SLOs or used as examples to develop your own ones.

`prometheus/v1`

Developing a prometheus/v1 SLI plugin is very easy, however you need to meet some requirements:

The plugin version used as a global called SLIPluginVersion.
A plugin ID global called SLIPluginID.
A Plugin logic function called SLIPlugin.
The plugin must be in a single file named plugin.go.
Plugins only can use the Go standard library (reflect and unsafe packages can't be used).
Plugin received options are a map[string]string to avoid interface{} problems on dynamic execution code, the conversion to specific types are responsibility of the plugin.
Plugins don't depend on go modules, GOPATH or similar (thanks to the previous requirements).

Sloth knows how to autodiscover plugins giving a path (--sli-plugins-path), and will load all the discovered ones.

A very simple example:

from plugins/x/y/plugin.go

package testplugin

import "context"

const (
  SLIPluginVersion = "prometheus/v1"
  SLIPluginID      = "test_plugin"
)

func SLIPlugin(ctx context.Context, meta, labels, options map[string]string) (string, error) {
  return "rate(my_raw_error_ratio_query{}[{{.window}}])", nil
}

Used in SLO spec:

version: "prometheus/v1"
service: "myservice"
slos:
  - name: "some-slo"
    objective: 99.9
    sli:
      plugin:
        id: "test_plugin"
        options:
          opt1: "something"
          opt2: "something"
    alerting:
#...

On spec load, Sloth will execute the referenced plugins with the options and use the result as a Raw SLI type, the one that returns the error ratio query.

Why should I use plugins?

By default you shouldn't unless you have scenarios where they can simplify, add security or improve the SLO adoption on the team/company. Some examples:

SLI custom validation (parameters, queries...).
Company wide precreated SLIs for common used libraries.
Complex Prometheus query SLIs.
Precreated SLIs for the team or company that normally everyones uses on the SLOs.
OSS SLI plugins that come with the apps, frameworks or libraries (e.g Kubernetes apiserver, http framework X...).
The company or the team could have a repository with all the shared plugins and everyone could use them and contribute with new ones.
Automation power when templates are not enough.

Why Sloth

Creating Prometheus rules for SLI/SLO framework is hard, error prone and is pure toil.

Sloth abstracts this task, and we also gain:

Read friendlyness: Easy to read and declare SLI/SLOs.
Gitops: Easy to integrate with CI flows like validation, checks...
Reliability and testing: Generated prometheus rules are already known that work, no need the creation of tests.
Centralize features and error fixes: An update in Sloth would be applied to all the SLOs managed/generated with it.
Standardize the metrics: Same conventions, automatic dashboards...
Rollout future features for free with the same specs: e.g automatic report creation.

SLI?

Service level indicator. Is a way of quantify how your service should be responding to user.

TL;DR: What is good/bad service for your users. E.g:

Requests >=500 considered errors.
Requests >200ms considered errors.
Process executions with exit code >0 considered errors.

Normally is measured using events: good/bad-events / total-events.

SLO?

Service level objective. A percent that will tell how many SLI errors your service can have in a specific period of time.

Error budget?

An error budget is the ammount of errors (driven by the SLI) you can have in a specific period of time, this is driven by the SLO.

Lets see an example:

SLI Error: Requests status code >= 500
Period: 30 days
SLO: 99.9%
Error budget: 0.0999 (100-99.9)
Total requests in 30 days: 10000
Available error requests: 9.99 (10000 * 0.0999 / 100)

If we have more than 9.99 request response with >=500 status code, we would be burning more error budget than the available, if we have less errors, we would end without spending all the error budget.

Burn rate?

The speed you are consuming your error budget. This is key for SLO based alerting (Sloth will create all these alerts), because depending on the speed you are consuming your error budget, it will trigger your alerts.

Speed/rate examples:

1: You are consuming 100% of the error budget in the expected period (e.g if 30d period, then 30 days).
2: You are consuming 200% of the error budget in the expected period (e.g if 30d period, then 15 days).
60: You are consuming 6000% of the error budget in the expected period (e.g if 30d period, then 12h hour).
1080: You are consuming 108000% of the error budget in the expected period (e.g if 30d period, then 40 minute).

SLO based alerting?

With SLO based alerting you will get better alerting to a regular alerting system, because:

Alerts on symptoms (SLIs), not causes.
Trigger at different levels (warning/ticket and critical/page).
Takes into account time and quantity, this is: speed of errors and number of errors on specific time.

The result of these is:

Correct time to trigger alerts (important == fast, not so important == slow).
Reduce alert fatigue.
Reduce false positives and negatives.

What are ticket and page alerts?

MWMB type alerting is based on two kinds of alerts, ticket and page:

page: Are critical alerts that normally are used to wake up, notify on important channels, trigger oncall...
ticket: The warning alerts that normally open tickets, post messages on non-important Slack channels...

These are triggered in different ways, page alerts are triggered faster but require faster error budget burn rate, on the other side, ticket alerts are triggered slower and require a lower and constant error budget burn rate.

Can I disable alerts?

Yes, use disable: true on page and ticket.

Grafana dashboard?

Check grafana-dashboard, this dashboard will load the SLOs automatically.

CLI VS K8s controller?

If you don't have Kubernetes and you need raw prometheus rules, its easy, the CLI (generate) mode is the only one that supports raw prometheus rules.

On the other side if you have Kubernetes (and most likely prometheus-operator). Using sloth.slok.dev/v1/PrometheusServiceLevel CRD will output the same result used as a CLI or used as a Kubernetes controller.

The only difference between bot modes is how Sloth application loads the SLOs manifest. On both modes the output will be a Prometheus Operator Rules CRD.

Both have pros and cons:

The CLI in an advanced gitops flow gives you faster feedback loops because of the generation on the CI.
Using as a controller the CRD integrates better in helm charts and similar because it removes that generation extra step.
Having the SLO as CRs in K8s, improves the discovery as you can always do kubectl get slos --all-namespaces.
The CLI doesn't require an app running, Sloth CRDs registered... the SLO generation process is simpler, so you have less PoFs.

In a few words, theres no right or wrong answer, pick your own flavour based on your use case: teams size, engineers in the company or development flow...

SLI types on manifests

prometheus/v1 (regular) and sloth.slok.dev/v1/PrometheusServiceLevel (Kubernetes CRD), support 3 ways of setting SLIs:

Events: This are based on 2 queries, the one that returns the total/valid number of events and the one that returns the bad events. Sloht will make a query dividing them to get the final error ratio (0-1).
Raw: This is a single raw prometheus query that when executed will return the error ratio (0-1).
Plugins: Check plugins section for more information. It reference plugins that will be preloaded and already developed. Sloth will execute them on generation and it will return a raw query. This is the best way to abstract queries from users or having SLOs at scale.

kareem-elsayed/sloth

Sloth

Introduction

Features

Get Sloth

Getting started

How does it work

Usage

CLI

Raw (Prometheus)

Kubernetes CRD (Prometheus-operator)

Kubernetes Controller (Prometheus-operator)

Examples

SLI plugins

prometheus/v1

F.A.Q

Why Sloth

SLI?

SLO?

Error budget?

Burn rate?

SLO based alerting?

What are ticket and page alerts?

Can I disable alerts?

Grafana dashboard?

CLI VS K8s controller?

SLI types on manifests

`prometheus/v1`