Return type of BinarySearchTree.predecessor is necessary?
bbvch13531 opened this issue · 1 comments
bbvch13531 commented
Brief Intro
predecessor, successor function in BinarySearchTree
public func predecessor() -> BinarySearchTree<T>?
public func successor() -> BinarySearchTree<T>?
Is BinarySearchTree<T>? necessary? I think BinarySearchTree? will fine.
If BinarySearchTree<T>? is necessary, would you please let me know the reason why?
If not, I take this issue and make PR.
Thanks 😄 .
More Details
kelvinlauKL commented
Probably. The author may have forgotten the briefer version. Feel free to make the correction if the compiler agrees with you 👍