/smlang-rs

A State Machine Language DSL procedual macro for Rust

Primary LanguageRustApache License 2.0Apache-2.0

smlang: A no_std State Machine Language DSL in Rust

Build Status Documentation

A state machine language DSL based on the syntax of Boost-SML.

smlang is a procedural macro library creating a state machine language DSL, whose aim to facilitate the use of state machines, as they quite fast can become overly complicated to write and get an overview of.

The library supports both async and non-async code.

Transition DSL

Below is a sample of the DSL. For a full description of the statemachine macro, please reference the DSL document.

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *SrcState1 + Event1 [ guard1 ] / action1 = DstState2, // * denotes starting state
        SrcState2 + Event2 [ guard2 ] / action2 = DstState1,
    }
    // ...
}

Where guard and action are optional and can be left out. A guard is a function which returns Ok(true) if the state transition should happen - otherwise, the transition should not happen. The action functions are run during the state machine transition.

This implies that any state machine must be written as a list of transitions.

The DSL supports wildcards and pattern matching for input states similar to rust pattern matching:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *State1 | State3 + ToState2 = State2,
        State1 | State2 + ToState3 = State3,
        _ + ToState4 = State4,
        State4 + ToState1 = State1,
    }
    // ...
}

Which is equivalent to:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *State1 + ToState2 = State2,
        State3 + ToState2 = State2,

        State1 + ToState3 = State3,
        State2 + ToState3 = State3,

        State1 + ToState4 = State4,
        State2 + ToState4 = State4,
        State3 + ToState4 = State4,
        State4 + ToState4 = State4,

        State4 + ToState1 = State1,
    }
    // ...
}

See example examples/input_state_pattern_match.rs for a usage example.

Internal transitions

The DSL supports internal transitions. Internal transition allow to accept an event and process an action, and then stay in the current state. Internal transitions can be specified explicitly, e.g.

State2 + Event2 / event2_action = State2,

or

State2 + Event2 / event2_action = _,

or implicitly, by omitting the target state including '='.

State2 + Event2 / event2_action,

It is also possible to define wildcard implicit (or explicit using '_') internal transitions.

statemachine! {
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event2 = State2,
        State1 + Event3 = State3,
        State1 + Event4 = State4,
        
        _ + Event2 / event2_action,
    },
}

The example above demonstrates how you could make Event2 acceptable for any state, not covered by any of the previous transitions, and to do an action to process it.

It is equivalent to:

statemachine! {
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event2 = State2,
        State1 + Event3 = State3,
        State1 + Event4 = State4,
        
        State2 + Event2 / event2_action = State2,
        State3 + Event2 / event2_action = State3,
        State4 + Event2 / event2_action = State4,
    },
}

See also tests: test_internal_transition_with_data() or test_wildcard_states_and_internal_transitions() for a usage example.

Guard expressions

Guard expression in square brackets [] allows to define a boolean expressions of multiple guard functions. For example:

statemachine! {
  transitions: {
      *Init + Login(Entry) [valid_entry] / attempt = LoggedIn,
      Init + Login(Entry) [!valid_entry && !too_many_attempts] / attempt = Init,
      Init + Login(Entry) [!valid_entry && too_many_attempts] / attempt = LoginDenied,
      LoggedIn + Logout / reset = Init,
  }
}

Guard expressions may consist of guard function names, and their combinations with &&, || and ! operations.

Multiple guarded transitions for the same state and triggering event

Multiple guarded transitions for the same state and triggering event are supported (see the example above). It is assumed that only one guard is enabled in such a case to avoid a conflict over which transition should be selected. However, if there is a conflict and more than one guard is enabled, the first enabled transition, in the order they appear in the state machine definition, will be selected.

State machine context

The state machine needs a context to be defined. The StateMachineContext is generated from the statemachine! proc-macro and is what implements guards and actions, and data that is available in all states within the state machine and persists between state transitions:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        State1 + Event1 = State2,
    }
    // ...
}

pub struct Context;

impl StateMachineContext for Context {}

fn main() {
    let mut sm = StateMachine::new(Context);

    // ...
}

See example examples/context.rs for a usage example.

State data

Any state may have some data associated with it:

pub struct MyStateData(pub u32);

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        State1(MyStateData) + Event1 = State2,
    }
    // ...
}

See example examples/state_with_data.rs for a usage example.

If the starting state contains data, this data must be provided after the context when creating a new machine.

pub struct MyStateData(pub u32);

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        State2 + Event2 / action = State1(MyStateData),
        *State1(MyStateData) + Event1 = State2,
        // ...
    }
    // ...
}

// ...

let mut sm = StateMachine::new(Context, MyStateData(42));

State data may also have associated lifetimes which the statemachine! macro will pick up and add the States enum and StateMachine structure. This means the following will also work:

pub struct MyStateData<'a>(&'a u32);

statemachine! {
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 / action = State2,
        State2(MyStateData<'a>) + Event2 = State1,
        // ...
    }
    // ...
}

See example examples/state_with_reference_data.rs for a usage example.

Event data

Data may be passed along with an event into the guard and action:

pub struct MyEventData(pub u32);

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        State1 + Event1(MyEventData) [guard] = State2,
    }
    // ...
}

Event data may also have associated lifetimes which the statemachine! macro will pick up and add the Events enum. This means the following will also work:

pub struct MyEventData<'a>(pub &'a u32);

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        State1 + Event1(MyEventData<'a>) [guard1] = State2,
        State1 + Event2(&'a [u8]) [guard2] = State3,
    }
    // ...
}

See example examples/event_with_data.rs for a usage example.

Guard and Action syntax

See example examples/guard_action_syntax.rs for a usage-example.

Async Guard and Action

Guards and actions may both be optionally async:

use smlang::{async_trait, statemachine};

statemachine! {
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 [guard1] / async action1 = State2,
        State2 + Event2 [async guard2] / action2 = State3,
    }
}


pub struct Context {
    // ...
}

impl StateMachineContext for Context {
    async fn action1(&mut self) -> () {
        // ...
    }

    async fn guard2(&mut self) -> Result<(), ()> {
        // ...
    }

    fn guard1(&mut self) -> Result<(), ()> {
        // ...
    }

    fn action2(&mut self) -> () {
        // ...
    }
}

See example examples/async.rs for a usage-example.

State Machine Examples

Here are some examples of state machines converted from UML to the State Machine Language DSL. Runnable versions of each example is available in the examples folder. The .pngs are generated with the graphviz feature.

Linear state machine

alt text

DSL implementation:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 = State2,
        State2 + Event2 = State3,
    }
}

This example is available in ex1.rs.

Looping state machine

alt text

DSL implementation:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 = State2,
        State2 + Event2 = State3,
        State3 + Event3 = State2,
    }
}

This example is available in ex2.rs.

Using guards and actions

alt text

DSL implementation:

statemachine!{
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 [guard] / action = State2,
    }
}

This example is available in ex3.rs.

Using entry and exit functions in transitions

The statemachine will create for all states an on_entry_ and on_exit_ function. If the are not used, they will be optimized away by the compiler. An example be found in on_entry_on_exit_generic.

Transition callback

The statemachine will call for every transition a transition callback. This function is called with both the old state and new state as arguments. An example can be found in dominos.

Helpers

Specify attributes for states and events

Setting events_attr and states_attr fields to a list of attributes to Events and States enums respectively. To derive Display, use derive_more::Display.

use core::Debug;
use derive_more::Display;
// ...
statemachine!{
    states_attr: #[derive(Debug, Display)],
    events_attr: #[derive(Debug, Display)],
    transitions: {
        *State1 + Event1 = State2,
    }
}

// ...

println!("Current state: {}", sm.state().unwrap());
println!("Expected state: {}", States::State1);
println!("Sending event: {}", Events::Event1);

// ...

Hooks for logging events, guards, actions, and state transitions

The StateMachineContext trait defines (and provides default, no-op implementations for) functions that are called for each event, guard, action, and state transition. You can provide your own implementations which plug into your preferred logging mechanism.

fn log_process_event(&self, current_state: &States, event: &Events) {}
fn log_guard(&self, guard: &'static str, result: &Result<(), ()>) {}
fn log_action(&self, action: &'static str) {}
fn log_state_change(&self, new_state: &States) {}

See examples/state_machine_logger.rs for an example which uses states_attr and events_attr to derive Debug implementations for easy logging.

Contributors

List of contributors in alphabetical order:


License

Licensed under either of

at your option.