Add an open source license, such as MIT and/or Apache 2.0
Closed this issue · 3 comments
TheButlah commented
I'd like to reference this code in some other work, but without an open source license, I won't be able to look at it.
Could you add a MIT and/or Apache 2.0 license?
kriswiner commented
The license for the code is as follows:
"Library may be used freely and without limit with proper attribution."
Anything you might add would be more restrictive, but you are free to do so
as long as the attribution command is followed.
…On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:13 PM Ryan Butler ***@***.***> wrote:
I'd like to reference this code in some other work, but without an open
source license, I won't be able to look at it.
Could you add a MIT and/or Apache 2.0 license?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTDLKXEDIOSQIXSOGKGY3TW266IFANCNFSM6AAAAAAVTCZOA4>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
TheButlah commented
Personally, I'd feel more comfortable if it had a commonly recognized license instead of an ad-hoc/custom but permissive one, because it reduces legal risk that some tomfoolery could happen. But thanks for the clarification at least :)
kriswiner commented
You may add one, as long as you respect the original (broader albeit
ad-hoc) license.
…On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 7:07 PM Ryan Butler ***@***.***> wrote:
Personally, I'd feel more comfortable if it had a commonly recognized
license instead of an ad-hoc/custom but permissive one. But thanks for the
clarification at least :)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTDLKV7P26OWQOJYSLXCH3W3U4XFANCNFSM6AAAAAAVTCZOA4>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>