Folder structure options and naming conventions for software projects
.
├── build # Compiled files (alternatively `dist`)
├── docs # Documentation files (alternatively `doc`)
├── src # Source files (alternatively `lib` or `app`)
├── test # Automated tests (alternatively `spec` or `tests`)
├── tools # Tools and utilities
├── LICENSE
└── README.md
Use short lowercase names at least for the top-level files and folders except
LICENSE
,README.md
The actual source files of a software project are usually stored inside the
src
folder. Alternatively, you can put them into the lib
(if you're
developing a library), or into the app
folder (if your application's source
files are not supposed to be compiled).
Samples: jQuery
src
, Node.jslib
andsrc
, D3.jssrc
, AngularJSsrc
, Adobe Bracketssrc
, three.jssrc
, Expresslib
, Socket.IOlib
, Less.jslib
, Redissrc
, Acelib
, Semantic UIsrc
, Zepto.jssrc
, Emscriptensrc
, RethinkDBsrc
, Bitcoinsrc
, MongoDBsrc
, Facebook Reactsrc
, Rustsrc
, ASP.NETsrc
, SignalRsrc
, libgit2src
Automated tests are usually placed into the test
or, less commonly, into the spec
or tests
folder.
Q: Why tests are placed into a seporate folder, as opposed to having them closer to the code under test?
A: Because you don't want to test the code, you want to test the program.
.
├── ...
├── test # Test files (alternatively `spec` or `tests`)
│ ├── benchmarks # Load and stress tests
│ ├── integration # End-to-end, integration tests (alternatively `e2e`)
│ └── unit # Unit tests
└── ...
Samples: jQuery, Node.js, D3.js, AngularJS, Adobe Brackets, three.js, Express, Socket.IO, Less.js, Bower, Mozilla PDF.js, Grunt, Gulp, Semantic UI, Zepto.js, Jade, RethinkDB, Vagrant, Sails.js, GitHub Hubot, Facebook React, Ansible, ASP.NET, browserify, Paper.js, Julia, Karma
Often it is beneficial to include some reference data into the project, such as
Reach-Text Format (RTF) documentation, which is usually stored into the docs
or, less commonly, into the doc
folder.
.
├── ...
├── docs # Documentation files (alternatively `doc`)
│ ├── TOC.md # Table of contents
│ ├── faq.md # Frequently asked questions
│ ├── misc.md # Miscellaneous information
│ ├── usage.md # Getting started guide
│ └── ... # etc.
└── ...
Samples: HTML5 Boilerplate
doc
, Backbonedocs
, three.jsdocs
, GitLabdoc
, Underscore.jsdocs
, Discoursedocs
, Gruntdocs
, Emscriptendocs
, RethinkDBdocs
, RequireJSdocs
, GitHub Hubotdocs
, Twitter Flightdoc
, Video.jsdocs
, Bitcoindoc
, MongoDBdocs
, Facebook Reactdocs
, libgit2docs
, Stylusdocs
, Gulpdocs
, Brunchdocs
...
...
...
...
If you want to share your work with others, please consider choosing an open
source license and include the text of the license into your project.
The text of a license is usually stored in the LICENSE
(or LICENSE.txt
,
LICENSE.md
) file in the root of the project.
You’re under no obligation to choose a license and it’s your right not to include one with your code or project. But please note that opting out of open source licenses doesn’t mean you’re opting out of copyright law.
You’ll have to check with your own legal counsel regarding your particular project, but generally speaking, the absence of a license means that default copyright laws apply. This means that you retain all rights to your source code and that nobody else may reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works from your work. This might not be what you intend.
Even in the absence of a license file, you may grant some rights in cases where you publish your source code to a site that requires accepting terms of service. For example, if you publish your source code in a public repository on GitHub, you have accepted the Terms of Service which do allow other GitHub users some rights. Specifically, you allow others to view and fork your repository.
For more info on how to choose a license for an open source project, please refer to http://choosealicense.com