Maximum-A-Posterior-MAP-classifier-UCI-WINE

Source

Original Owners:

Forina, M. et al, PARVUS -An Extendible Package for Data Exploration, Classification and Correlation.Institute of Pharmaceutical and Food Analysis and Technologies, Via Brigata Salerno,16147 Genoa, Italy.

Donor: Stefan Aeberhard, email: stefan '@' coral.cs.jcu.edu.au

Data Set Information

These data are the results of a chemical analysis of wines grown in the same region in Italy but derived from three different cultivars. The analysis determined the quantities of 13 constituents found in each of the three types of wines.

  1. Alcohol
  2. Malic acid
  3. Ash
  4. Alcalinity of ash
  5. Magnesium
  6. Total phenols
  7. Flavanoids
  8. Nonflavanoid phenols
  9. Proanthocyanins
  10. Color intensity
  11. Hue
  12. OD280/OD315 of diluted wines
  13. Proline

Relevant Papers

(1) S. Aeberhard, D. Coomans and O. de Vel, Comparison of Classifiers in High Dimensional Settings, Tech. Rep. no. 92-02, (1992), Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, James Cook University of North Queensland. (Also submitted to Technometrics).

The data was used with many others for comparing various classifiers. The classes are separable, though only RDA has achieved 100% correct classification. (RDA : 100%, QDA 99.4%, LDA 98.9%, 1NN 96.1% (z-transformed data)) (All results using the leave-one-out technique)

(2) S. Aeberhard, D. Coomans and O. de Vel, "THE CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF RDA" Tech. Rep. no. 92-01, (1992), Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, James Cook University of North Queensland. (Also submitted to Journal of Chemometrics).

Here, the data was used to illustrate the superior performance of the use of a new appreciation function with RDA.