Feature Request: Explicit tagging keywords

[AFifarek]

I'm posting this cause I thought about it and want to get everyone's opinion:

Perhaps a version of the tagging that was established for the observe keyword [Issue #28] could also be incorporated for the user when writing a text-only requirements. That way they aren't solely reliant on the presence of only quoted text to define if analysis will be conducted on the atomic element.

This may be overkill but its a thought.

[jendavis]

My preference is not to burden users with a keyword for text-only requirements. But either way is okay.

…

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:48 AM, AFifarek ***@***.***> wrote: I'm posting this cause I thought about it and want to get everyone's opinion: Perhaps a version of the tagging that was established for the *observe* keyword [Issue #28 <#28>] could also be incorporated for the user when writing a text-only requirements. That way they aren't solely reliant on the presence of only quoted text to define if analysis will be conducted on the atomic element. This may be overkill but its a thought. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#59>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOirRJr6EjZgI4b6GSCmno4NdROwh3jFks5rQ8RggaJpZM4Lfs77> .

-- Jennifer A. Davis, Ph.D. Sr. Applied Mathematician Trusted Systems, Advanced Technology Center Rockwell Collins (319) 295-0370 (O), (319) 210-3720 (C) Any Export License Required Information and License Restricted Third Party Intellectual Property (TPIP) content must be encrypted and sent to Jen.Davis@corp.rockwellcollins.com.

[AFifarek]

I was thinking that this could be an optional tag so if users find it a burden they would not have to use it.

[jendavis]

Oh, I see. In that case I have no preference either way. If you think it would be helpful, then it seems reasonable to make it a request.

…

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:25 PM, AFifarek ***@***.***> wrote: I was thinking that this could be an optional tag so if users find it a burden they would not have to use it. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#59 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOirRHibST3DjDWzEYCg7QpCdFjJ6kInks5rQ80VgaJpZM4Lfs77> .

-- Jennifer A. Davis, Ph.D. Sr. Applied Mathematician Trusted Systems, Advanced Technology Center Rockwell Collins (319) 295-0370 (O), (319) 210-3720 (C) Any Export License Required Information and License Restricted Third Party Intellectual Property (TPIP) content must be encrypted and sent to Jen.Davis@corp.rockwellcollins.com.

[AFifarek]

Not sure if it's worth the effort for it but it would make it obvious to the user that the element is only textual.

[lgwagner]

I'm trying to close issues, not create more.

[lgwagner]

Will not be implemented.