This folder contains GitHub-specific configuration for Open Notebook's contribution workflow.
We have three issue templates to guide contributors:
For reporting bugs or unexpected behavior when the app is running but misbehaving.
Key Features:
- Structured format for bug details
- Environment and version information
- Checkbox for contributors who want to fix the issue
- Automatic
bugandneeds-triagelabels
When to Use: App is installed and running, but something doesn't work as expected.
For suggesting new features or improvements.
Key Features:
- Description of the feature
- Explanation of why it would be helpful
- Space for proposed solution
- Checkbox for contributors who want to implement it
- Automatic
enhancementandneeds-triagelabels
When to Use: You have an idea for a new feature or improvement.
For problems with installation or setup.
Key Features:
- Deployment type selection
- Environment details
- Error message collection
- Automatic
installationlabel
When to Use: Having trouble getting Open Notebook running.
The PR template (pull_request_template.md) ensures contributors provide all necessary information:
Sections:
- Description and related issue
- Type of change
- Testing details
- Design alignment with project principles
- Comprehensive checklist for code quality, testing, documentation
- Screenshots for UI changes
Key Checkpoints:
- References an approved issue
- Aligns with design principles
- Includes tests and documentation
- Follows code style guidelines
Our CI/CD workflows in .github/workflows/:
- Builds Docker images on releases
- Publishes to Docker Hub and GitHub Container Registry
- Supports multi-platform builds (amd64, arm64)
- Builds dev images on pushes to main
- Tags with commit SHA for testing
- Automated code review using Claude Code
- Runs on pull requests
- Provides AI-powered suggestions
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Contributor identifies a bug or has a feature idea │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Creates an issue using appropriate template │
│ - Describes the problem/feature │
│ - Checks "I am a developer..." if willing to work │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Maintainer reviews issue (within 48 hours) │
│ - Assesses alignment with design principles │
│ - Labels appropriately │
│ - Asks for clarification if needed │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. If approved: Contributor proposes solution approach │
│ - Discusses implementation strategy │
│ - Maintainer provides feedback │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. Issue is assigned to contributor │
│ - Contributor forks repo │
│ - Creates feature branch from main │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 6. Contributor develops solution │
│ - Reads DESIGN_PRINCIPLES.md │
│ - Reads docs/development/architecture.md │
│ - Writes code, tests, documentation │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 7. Creates Pull Request │
│ - Uses PR template │
│ - References issue number │
│ - Fills out all checklist items │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 8. Maintainer reviews PR │
│ - Checks code quality │
│ - Verifies tests pass │
│ - Ensures alignment with architecture │
│ - Provides feedback or approves │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 9. If approved: PR is merged! 🎉 │
│ - Contributor is thanked │
│ - Issue is closed │
│ - Changes included in next release │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
- Contributors don't spend time on code that won't be merged
- Ensures alignment with project vision before coding starts
- All code reviewed against design principles
- Consistent architecture across contributions
- Proper testing and documentation
- Clear expectations upfront
- Structured feedback process
- Efficient review process
- Maintainers can guide direction
- Features align with long-term goals
- Technical debt is minimized
For contributors:
- CONTRIBUTING.md - Contribution guidelines
- DESIGN_PRINCIPLES.md - Project vision and principles
- docs/development/architecture.md - Technical architecture
For maintainers:
- MAINTAINER_GUIDE.md - How to review and manage contributions
- Join our Discord
- Open a Discussion
- Read the FAQ
Thank you for contributing to Open Notebook! Your contributions help make this the best open-source research tool available.