details about training and evaluate on the ActorsHQ dataset.
liwenssss opened this issue · 4 comments
Hi, I tried your code on the ActorsHQ dataset (actors1/seq1). I used 46 cameras for training and 1 view for evaluation. My config settings are as follows:
train:
dataset: MvRgbDatasetActorsHQ
data:
subject_name: actor01
data_dir: /nfs/datasets/humanrf-dataset/tmp/actorshq/Actor01/Sequence1/
frame_range: &id001
- 48
- 2177
- 1
used_cam_ids: [4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23, 36, 37, 38, 39, 52, 53, 54, 55, 76, 77, 78, 79, 92, 93, 94, 95, 108, 109, 110, 111, 125, 126, 130, 131, 134, 135, 138, 139, 142, 143, 146, 147, 150, 151, 154, 155, 158, 159]
load_smpl_pos_map: true
......
test:
dataset: MvRgbDatasetActorsHQ
data:
data_dir: /nfs/datasets/humanrf-dataset/tmp/actorshq/Actor01/Sequence1/
frame_range: *id001
subject_name: actor01
view_setting: camera
render_view_idx: 127
global_orient: true
img_scale: 1.0
save_mesh: false
render_skeleton: false
save_tex_map: false
save_ply: false
n_pca: 20
sigma_pca: 2.0
prev_ckpt: ./results/actor01/avatar/batch_800000
model:
with_viewdirs: true
random_style: false
I tested all the 2129 frames under Cam128 (render_view_idx 127) and got the following results:
Count: 2129, PSNR: 28.642307322254315, SSIM: 0.922512511663277, LPIPS: 0.08213683989418678
The results seem a little lower than those in the paper. Is this normal?
We test on Cam127 and the 48-547 frames. Here is our results.
Can you provide the training view index ? It seems that Cam127(view index 126) in the training camera list.
We evaluate training view reconstruction.
We evaluate training view reconstruction.
Thanks. Can you provide your trained checkpoint files along with the training configuration files? I want to compare my experimental results with yours.