bpftime
, a full-featured, high-performance eBPF runtime designed to operate in userspace. It offers fast Uprobe and Syscall hook capabilities: Userspace uprobe can be 10x faster than kernel uprobe! and can programmatically hook all syscalls of a process safely and efficiently.
📦 Key Features
🔨 Quick Start
🔌 Examples & Use Cases
⌨️ Linux Plumbers 23 talk
📖 Slides
📚 Arxiv preprint
- Uprobe and Syscall hooks based on binary rewriting: Run eBPF programs in userspace, attaching them to Uprobes and Syscall tracepoints: No mannual instrumentation or restart required!. It can
trace
,replace
orpatch
the execution of a function,hook
,filter
orredirect
all syscalls of a process safely, and efficiently with an eBPF userspace runtime. - Performance: Experience up to a 10x speedup in Uprobe overhead compared to kernel uprobe and uretprobe.
- Interprocess eBPF Maps: Implement userspace eBPF maps in shared userspace memory for summary aggregation or control plane communication.
- Compatibility: use existing eBPF toolchains like clang and libbpf to develop userspace eBPF without any modifications. Supporting CO-RE via BTF, and offering userspace host function access.
- JIT Support: Benefit from a cross-platform eBPF interpreter and a high-speed JIT compiler powered by LLVM. It also includes a handcrafted x86 JIT in C for limited resources.
- No instrumentation: Can inject eBPF runtime into any running process without the need for a restart or manual recompilation.
- Run with kernel eBPF: Can load userspace eBPF from kernel, and using kernel eBPF maps to cooperate with kernel eBPF programs like kprobes and network filters.
vm
: The eBPF VM and JIT for eBPF, you can choose from bpftime LLVM JIT and a simple JIT/interpreter based on ubpf. It can be built as a standalone library and integrated into other projects. The API is similar to ubpf.runtime
: The userspace runtime for eBPF, including the syscall server and agent, attaching eBPF programs to Uprobes and Syscall tracepoints, and eBPF maps in shared memory.daemon
: A daemon to make userspace eBPF working with kernel and compatible with kernel uprobe. Monitor and modify kernel eBPF events and syscalls, load eBPF in userspace from kernel.
With bpftime
, you can build eBPF applications using familiar tools like clang and libbpf, and execute them in userspace. For instance, the malloc
eBPF program traces malloc calls using uprobe and aggregates the counts using a hash map.
You can refer to documents/build-and-test.md for how to build the project, or using the container images from GitHub packages.
To get started, you can build and run a libbpf based eBPF program starts with bpftime
cli:
make -C example/malloc # Build the eBPF program example
bpftime load ./example/malloc/malloc
In another shell, Run the target program with eBPF inside:
$ bpftime start ./example/malloc/victim
Hello malloc!
malloc called from pid 250215
continue malloc...
malloc called from pid 250215
You can also dynamically attach the eBPF program with a running process:
$ ./example/malloc/victim & echo $! # The pid is 101771
[1] 101771
101771
continue malloc...
continue malloc...
And attach to it:
$ sudo bpftime attach 101771 # You may need to run make install in root
Inject: "/root/.bpftime/libbpftime-agent.so"
Successfully injected. ID: 1
You can see the output from original program:
$ bpftime load ./example/malloc/malloc
...
12:44:35
pid=247299 malloc calls: 10
pid=247322 malloc calls: 10
Alternatively, you can also run our sample eBPF program directly in the kernel eBPF, to see the similar output:
$ sudo example/malloc/malloc
15:38:05
pid=30415 malloc calls: 1079
pid=30393 malloc calls: 203
pid=29882 malloc calls: 1076
pid=34809 malloc calls: 8
See documents/usage.md for more details.
tracing userspace functions with uprobe
: Attach uprobe, uretprobe or all syscall tracepoints(currently x86 only) eBPF programs to a process or a group of processes:malloc
: count the malloc calls in libc by pid. demonstrate how to use the userspaceuprobe
with basichashmap
.bashreadline
: Print entered bash commands from running shells,sslsniff
: Trace and print all SSL/TLS connections and raw traffic data.
tracing all syscalls with tracepoints
opensnoop
: trace file open or close syscalls in a process. demonstrate how to use the userspacesyscall tracepoint
withring buffer
output.
More bcc/libbpf-tools examples can be found in example/libbpf-tools.
You can also run bpftime with bpftrace
, we've test it on this commit. More details about how to run bpftrace in usespace, can be found in example/bpftrace.
⚠️ Note:bpftime
is actively under development, and it's not yet recommended for production use. See our roadmap for details. We'd love to hear your feedback and suggestions! Please feel free to open an issue or Contact us.
bpftime supports two modes:
Left: original kernel eBPF | Right: bpftime
In this mode, bpftime can run eBPF programs in userspace without kernel. It relies on a userspace verifier to ensure the safety of eBPF programs.
In this mode, bpftime can run together with kernel eBPF. It can load eBPF programs from kernel, and using kernel eBPF maps to cooperate with kernel eBPF programs like kprobes and network filters.
Current hook implementation is based on binary rewriting and the underly technique is inspired by:
- Userspace function hook: frida-gum
- Syscall hooks: zpoline and pmem/syscall_intercept.
The hook can be easily replaced with other DBI methods or frameworks, or add more hook mechanisms in the future.
see our draft arxiv paper bpftime: userspace eBPF Runtime for Uprobe, Syscall and Kernel-User Interactions for details.
How is the performance of userspace uprobe
compared to kernel uprobes
?
Probe/Tracepoint Types | Kernel (ns) | Userspace (ns) |
---|---|---|
Uprobe | 3224.172760 | 314.569110 |
Uretprobe | 3996.799580 | 381.270270 |
Syscall Tracepoint | 151.82801 | 232.57691 |
Embedding runtime | Not avaliable | 110.008430 |
It can be attached to functions in running process just like the kernel uprobe does.
How is the performance of LLVM JIT/AOT compared to other eBPF userspace runtimes, native code or wasm runtimes?
Across all tests, the LLVM JIT for bpftime consistently showcased superior performance. Both demonstrated high efficiency in integer computations (as seen in log2_int), complex mathematical operations (as observed in prime), and memory operations (evident in memcpy and strcmp). While they lead in performance across the board, each runtime exhibits unique strengths and weaknesses. These insights can be invaluable for users when choosing the most appropriate runtime for their specific use-cases.
see github.com/eunomia-bpf/bpf-benchmark for how we evaluate and details.
Hash map or ring buffer compared to kernel(TODO)
See benchmark dir for detail performance benchmarks.
bpftime
allows you to useclang
andlibbpf
to build eBPF programs, and run them directly in this runtime. We have tested it with a libbpf version in third_party/libbpf. No specify libbpf or clang version needed.- Some kernel helpers and kfuncs may not be available in userspace.
- It does not support direct access to kernel data structures or functions like
task_struct
.
Refer to documents/available-features.md for more details.
see documents/build-and-test.md for details.
bpftime
is continuously evolving with more features in the pipeline:
- ring buffer output support.
- perf event output support.
- Figure out how to run transparently with kernel probe
- An AOT compiler for eBPF can be easily added based on the LLVM IR.
- More examples and usecases:
- Network on userspace eBPF
- Hotpatch userspace application
- Error injection and filter syscall
- etc...
- More map types and distribution maps support.
- More program types support.
Stay tuned for more developments from this promising project! You can find bpftime
on GitHub.
This project is licensed under the MIT License.
- PLCT Lab from ISCAS
- Prof. Qi Li from Tsinghua University NISL Lab
- Prof. Wenbo Shen from ZJU