Thank HiroIshida for the code. https://github.com/HiroIshida/robust-tube-mpc . His code mainly focues on the 2-state system, and I edit it to the 6-state.
This repository includes examples for the tube model predictive control (tube-MPC)[1] as well as the generic model predictive control (MPC) written in MATLAB.
- optimization_toolbox (matlab)
- control_toolbox (matlab)
- Multi-Parametric Toolbox 3 (open-source and freely available at http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~mpt/3/)
If you find this package helpful, giving a "star" to this repositry will be a happy feedback for me! If you find a bug, or have more broader kind of quession about tube MPC,please post that in the issue page. I will try hard to respond to questions via e-mail but, I strongly recommend do it in the issue page. It's much easier for me to keep myself on track.
See example/example_tubeMPC.m
and example/example_MPC.m
for the tube-MPC and generic MPC, respectively. Note that every inequality constraint here is expressed as a convex set. For example, the constraints on the state Xc
is specified as a rectangular, which is constructed with 4 vertexes. When considering a 1-dim input Uc
, Uc
will be specified by min and max value (i.e. u∊[u_min, u_max]
), so it will be constructed by 2 vertexes. For more detail, please see the example codes.
After running example/example_tubeMPC.m
, you will get the following figure sequence.
Now that you can see that the green nominal trajectory starting from the bottom left of the figure and surrounding a "tube". At each time step, the nominal trajectory (green line) is computed online.
Let me give some important details. The red region Xc
that contains the pink region Xc-Z
is the state constraint that we give first. However, considering the uncertainty, the tube-MPC designs the nominal trajectory to be located inside Xc-Z
, which enables to put "tube" around the nominal trajectory such that the tube is also contained in Xc-Z
. Of course, the input sequence associated with the nominal trajectory is inside of Uc-KZ
.
I think one may get stuck at computation of what paper [1] called "disturbance invariant set". The disturbance invariant set is an infinite Minkowski addition Z = W ⨁ Ak*W ⨁ Ak^2*W...
, where ⨁ denotes Minkowski addition. Because it's an infinite sum of Minkowski addition, computing Z analytically is intractable. In [2], Racovic proposed a method to efficiently compute an outer approximiation of Z, which seems to be heavily used in MPC community. In this repository, computation of Z takes place in the constructor of DisturbanceLinearSystem
class. To understand how Z guarantee the robustness, running example/example_dist_inv_set.m
may help you.
I used the maximal positively invariant (MPI) set Xmpi
as the terminal constraint set. (Terminal constraint is usually denoted as Xf in literature). Book [3] explains the concept of the MPI and algorithm well in section 2.4. Xmpi
is computed in the constructor of OptimalControler.m
. Note that the MPI set is computed with Xc
and Uc
in the normal MPC setting, but in the tube-MPC the MPI set is computed with Xc⊖Z
and Uc⊖Z
instead.
[1] Mayne, David Q., María M. Seron, and S. V. Raković. "Robust model predictive control of constrained linear systems with bounded disturbances." Automatica 41.2 (2005): 219-224. [2] Rakovic, Sasa V., et al. "Invariant approximations of the minimal robust positively invariant set." IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 50.3 (2005): 406-410. [3] Kouvaritakis, Basil, and Mark Cannon. "Model predictive control." Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (2016).