📐Let there be algebraic effects in JavaScript
No more function color! Yes one-shot delimited continuation!
What the hell?! Well... I really recommend that you read this blog post by Dan Abramov explaining algebraic effects - and how it could be very useful on our JavaScript code!
This project is a runnable POC with a Babel's "plugin", so you could write some code and taste this new concept in JavaScript. Its features, syntax, and goals are very inspired by Dan Abramov's blog post mentioned above. In short, with algebraic effects, you could separate what from the how and have fewer refactors.
Related:
It's a very simple proof of concept! There is a lot of work to improve this idea, spec, and implementation.
Again, the syntax needs to be improved. But at this moment we have:
- Expression
perform <value>
You could use this keyword inside of any function (not arrow functions!) in order to launch an effect.
Similar to throw
, it'll search for the closest try/handle
at call stack to perform an effect passing <value>
as the effect name. Unlike throw
, perform
is an expression and will return a value to continue running the code.
if (name === null) {
name = perform 'ask_name'
console.log(name) // after evaluate perform, will run this line
}
- Block
handle
attry
Just like the catch
block, you should use it to handle the effect launched inside of the try
block.
And again as like catch
block, this block has a parameter to bind the <value>
used at perform
.
try {
...
} handle (effect) {
if (effect === 'ask_name') {
...
}
}
- Statement
resume
It should be used inside of the handle
block in order to resume the perform
expression, returning a value.
It must be used inside of handle
block and must be in handle
block directly.
try {
...
} handle (effect) {
if (effect === 'ask_name') {
resume 'Arya Stark'
}
}
One of its most powerful features is to use inside a block with an async operation so you could call an async operator without the need to use an async/await operators on the function - that is, less refactors and a function could be sync and async at the same time!
if (effect === 'ask_name') {
await wait(1000)
resume 'Arya Stark'
}
- operator
@@
Unfortunately, we still can't inject implicitly the effects inside of a function call outside of the try
block, so you should use @@
at a function call that could launch effects.
function getName(user) {
let name = user.name;
if (name === null) {
name = perform 'ask_name';
}
return name;
}
function displayNameCapitalized(user) {
const name = getName@@(user) // need to use @@
console.log(name.toUpperCase())
}
const arya = { name: null };
try {
displayNameCapitalized(arya); // doesn't need to use @@
} handle (effect) {
...
}
- no
resume
Since perform
is an expression, it always return a value. If resume
wasn't called after a perform, it'll be undefined
:
function sayName () {
const name = perform 'a_typo_error'
console.log(name) // undefined
}
try {
sayName()
} handle (effect) {
if (effect === 'ask_name') {
resume 'Arya Stark'
}
}
- no
try/handle
block
If a perform
is called without a try/handle
, an expection will be launched.
function sayName () {
const name = perform 'ask_name' // will throw Error('Unhandled effect')
console.log(name)
}
sayName()
- nested
try/handle
(not implemented yet)
If you have two or more nested try/handle
, you'll need to call resume
on handle
block
function sayNameAndAge () {
const name = perform 'ask_name'
const age = perform 'ask_age'
console.log(name, age) // 'Arya Stark 25'
}
function wrapperAgeEffect () {
try {
sayNameAndAge()
} handle (effect) {
if (effect === 'ask_age') {
resume 25
}
const result = perform effect
return result
}
}
try {
wrapperAgeEffect()
} handle (effect) {
if (effect === 'ask_name') {
resume 'Arya Stark'
}
}
1 - Clone this repo:
> git clone git@github.com:macabeus/js-proposal-algebraic-effects.git
2 - Run some commands on Babel:
> cd babel
> make bootstrap
> make watch
3 - So you could compile the sample with:
> cd babel-algebraic-effects
> yarn start