manchelsi/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license

Just a small hack inspired by https://github.com/Zegorax/OnlyOffice-Unlimited

OnlyOffice Community server with license

Usage

Podman CLI

podman run \
    --name=onlyoffice \
    --detach \
    --publish=80:80 \
    docker.io/alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license

Docker CLI

docker run \
    --name=onlyoffice \
    --detach \
    --publish=80:80 \
    alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license

docker-compose.yml

services:
  onlyoffice:
    container_name: onlyoffice
    image: alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license
    ports:
      - "80"

Build

Buildah CLI

buildah build-using-dockerfile \
    --tag=onlyoffice-patched \
    https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git

Docker CLI

docker build \
    --tag=onlyoffice-patched \
    https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git

docker-compose.yml

services:
  onlyoffice:
    container_name: onlyoffice
    image: onlyoffice-patched
    build:
      context: https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git
    …

Verify

To verify that the container is running successfully open [server-url]/healthcheck (has to return true) and for the version number open [server-url]/web-apps/apps/api/documents/api.js and check the header comment.

Background

Recently, just about a month after Nextcloud announced their partnership with Ascensio and featuring a community version of OnlyOffice, the latter decided to remove support for mobile editing of documents via the Nextcloud app.

This happened without any prior notice and alienated quite a lot of home users, who would now be forced to pay more than €1.000 to unlock that previously free feature. Only after some outcries Ascensio deigned to release a statement and a new, albeit "limited", offer of €90 for home servers.

In my opinion these deceptive practices are unacceptable for a company advertising itself and their product as open source.

Thanks

This repo was heavily inspired by the works of Zegorax/OnlyOffice-Unlimited.