I said I want SIMPLE runtypes. Just functions that validate and return data. Combine them into complex types and Typescript knows their structure. Thats how runtypes work.
npm install simple-runtypes or yarn add simple-runtypes
- Define the Runtype:
import * as st from 'simple-runtypes'
const userRuntype = st.record({
id: st.integer(),
name: st.string(),
email: st.optional(st.string()),
})now, ReturnType<typeof userRuntype> is equivalent to
interface {
id: number,
name: string,
email?: string
}- Use the runtype to validate untrusted data
userRuntype({id: 1, name: 'matt'})
// => {id: 1, name: 'matt'}
userRuntype({id: 1, name: 'matt', isAdmin: true})
// throws an st.RuntypeError: "invalid field 'isAdmin' in data"Invoke a runtype with use to get a plain value back instead of throwing errors:
st.use(userRuntype, {id: 1, name: 'matt'})
// => {ok: true, result: {id: 1, name: 'matt'}}
st.use(userRuntype, {id: 1, name: 'matt', isAdmin: true})
// => {ok: false, error: FAIL}
st.getFormattedError(FAIL)
// => 'invalid keys in record ["isAdmin"] at `<value>` in `{"id":1,"name": "matt", ... }`'Not throwing errors is way more efficient and less obscure. Throwing errors and catching them outside is more convenient.
Why should I use this over the plethora of other runtype validation libraries available?
- Strict: by default safe against proto injection attacks and unwanted properties
- Fast: check the benchmark
- Friendly: no use of
eval, a small footprint and no dependencies - Flexible: optionally modify the data while its being checked: trim strings, convert numbers, parse dates
@moltar has done a great job comparing existing runtime typechecking libraries in moltar/typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks.
@pongo has benchmarked simple-runtypes against io-ts in pongo/benchmark-simple-runtypes.
A Runtype is a function that:
- receives an unknown value
- returns that value or a copy if all validations pass
- throws a
RuntypeErrorwhen validation fails or returnsValidationResultwhen passed touse
interface Runtype<T> {
(v: unknown) => T
}Runtypes are constructed by calling factory functions.
For instance, string creates and retuns a string runtype.
Check the factory functions documentation for more details.
When using record, any properties which are not defined in the runtype will cause the runtype to fail:
const strict = st.record({name: st.string()})
strict({name: 'foo', other: 123})
// => RuntypeError: Unknown attribute 'other'To ignore single properties, use ignore, unknown or any:
const strict = st.record({name: st.string(), other: st.ignore()})
strict({name: 'foo', other: 123})
// => {name: foo, other: undefined}Use sloppyRecord to only validate known properties and remove everything else:
const sloppy = st.sloppyRecord({name: st.string()})
strict({name: 'foo', other: 123, bar: []})
// => {name: foo}Using any of record or sloppyRecord will keep you safe from any __proto__ injection or overriding attempts.
Use the optional runtype to create optional properties:
const squareConfigRuntype = st.record({
color: st.optional(st.string()),
width?: st.optional(st.number()),
})Collection runtypes such as record, array, tuple take runtypes as their parameters:
const nestedRuntype = st.record({
name: st.string(),
items: st.array(st.record({ id: st.integer, label: st.string() })),
})
nestedRuntype({
name: 'foo',
items: [{ id: 3, label: 'bar' }],
}) // => returns the same dataSimple-runtypes supports Discriminating Unions via the union runtype.
The example found in the Typescript Handbook translated to simple-runtypes:
const networkLoadingState = st.record({
state: st.literal('loading'),
})
const networkFailedState = st.record({
state: st.literal('failed'),
code: st.number(),
})
const networkSuccessState = st.record({
state: st.literal('success'),
response: st.record({
title: st.string(),
duration: st.number(),
summary: st.string(),
})
})
const networdStateRuntype = st.union(
networkLoadingState,
networkFailedState,
networkSuccessState,
)
type NetworkState = ReturnType<networkStateRuntype>Finding the runtype to validate a specific discriminating union with is done efficiently with a Map.
Write your own runtypes as plain functions, e.g. if you want to turn a string into a BigInt:
const bigIntStringRuntype = st.string({match: /^-?[0-9]+n$/})
const bigIntRuntype = st.runtype((v) => {
const stringCheck = st.use(bigIntStringRuntype, v)
if (!stringCheck.ok) {
return stringCheck.error
}
return BigInt(stringCheck.result.slice(0, -1))
})
bigIntRuntype("123n") // => 123n
bigIntRuntype("2.2") // => error: "expected string to match ..."Basic runtypes that match TS / Javascript types:
Meta runtypes
Objects and Array Runtypes
Combinators
unionintersectionomitpickpartial- TODO:
get- similar to Type[key]
Shortcuts
size- a meta-runtype that imposes a size limit on types, maybe via convert-to-json and .length on the value passed to it- rename
stringLiteralUniontoliteralsorliteralUnionand make it work on all types thatliteralaccepts - rename
sloppyRecordtorecord.sloppybecause I need the "sloppy"-concept for other runtypes too: e.g.nullable.sloppy- aRuntype<T | null>that also acceptsundefinedwhich is useful to slowly add new nullable fields to existing json database records - improve docs:
- preface: what is a runtype and why is it useful
- why: explain or link to example that shows "strict by default"
- show that simple-runtypes is feature complete because it can
- express all typescript types
- is extendable with custom runtypes (add documentation)
- add small frontend and backend example projects that show how to use simple-runtypes in production
- test types with tsd
- add missing combinators: partial, required
- add other combinators like partial, required, ...