Sunspot is a great Ruby library for constructing searches against Solr. However, because of the way the Sunspot DSL is constructed, it can be difficult to do simple assertions about your searches without doing full integration tests.
The goal of these matchers are to make it easier to unit test search logic without having to construct the individual fixture scenarios inside of Solr and then actually perform a search against Solr.
You will need to replace the Sunspot Session object with the spy provided. You can do this globally by putting the following in your spec_helper.
config.before do
Sunspot.session = SunspotMatchers::SunspotSessionSpy.new(Sunspot.session)
end
Keep in mind, this will prevent any test from actually hitting Solr, so if you have integration tests, you'll either need to be more careful which tests you replace the session for, or you'll need to restore the original session before those tests
Sunspot.session = Sunspot.session.original_session
You will also need to include the matchers in your specs. Again, this can be done globally in your spec_helper.
config.include SunspotMatchers
Alternately, you could include them into individual tests if needed.
You will need to replace the Sunspot Session object with the spy provided. You can do this by requiring the sunspot test helper
require 'sunspot_matchers/test_helper'
and then in the test case that you wish to override, including the SunspotMatchers::TestHelper class and set the sunspot session in your setup.
include SunspotMatchers::TestHelper
def setup
Sunspot.session = SunspotMatchers::SunspotSessionSpy.new(Sunspot.session)
end
If you perform a search against your Post model, you could write this expectation:
Sunspot.session.should be_a_search_for(Post)
Individual searches are stored in an array, so if you perform multiple, you'll have to match against them manually. Without an explicit search specified, it will use the last one.
Sunspot.session.searches.first.should be_a_search_for(Post)
If you want to verify that a model has a searchable field, you can use this matcher:
Post.should have_searchable_field(:name)
You can also use the shorthand syntax:
describe User do
it { should have_searchable_field(:name) }
end
This is where the bulk of the functionality lies. There are seven types of search matches you can perform: keywords
or fulltext
,
with
, without
, paginate
, order_by
, facet
, and boost
.
In all of the examples below, the expectation fully matches the search terms. This is not expected or required. You can
have a dozen with
restrictions on a search and still write an expectation on a single one of them.
Negative expectations also work correctly. should_not
will fail if the search actually includes the expectation.
With all matchers, you can pass a block and perform multi statement expectations inside the
block. Keep in mind, that only the expectation type specified as the argument will actually be checked. So if
you specify keywords
and with
restrictions in the same block, but you said have_search_params(:keywords, ...
the with
restrictions are simply ignored.
Without creative usage of parentheses you can not use do...end blocks to pass multi statement expectations to the matcher though. Because do...end have such a low binding precedent, the block is passed to the wrong method. Curly syntax blocks will work though {...}, or you can pass a Proc as the last argument.
keywords, with, without, and order_by support wildcard expectations using the any_param
parameter:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
with :blog_id, 4
order_by :blog_id, :desc
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:with, :blog_id, any_param)
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:order_by, :blog_id, any_param)
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:order_by, any_param)
Sunspot.session.should_not have_search_params(:order_by, :category_ids, any_param)
You can match against a keyword search:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
keywords 'great pizza'
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:keywords, 'great pizza')
You can match against a with restriction:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
with :author_name, 'Mark Twain'
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:with, :author_name, 'Mark Twain')
Complex conditions can be matched by using a block instead of a value. Be aware that order does matter, not for
the actual results that would come out of Solr, but the matcher will fail of the order of with
restrictions is
different.
Sunspot.search(Post) do
any_of do
with :category_ids, 1
with :category_ids, 2
end
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:with) {
any_of do
with :category_ids, 1
with :category_ids, 2
end
}
Without is nearly identical to with:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
without :author_name, 'Mark Twain'
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:without, :author_name, 'Mark Twain')
You can also specify only page or per_page, both are not required.
Sunspot.search(Post) do
paginate :page => 3, :per_page => 15
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:paginate, :page => 3, :per_page => 15)
Expectations on multiple orderings are supported using using the block format mentioned above.
Sunspot.search(Post) do
order_by :published_at, :desc
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:order_by, :published_at, :desc)
Standard faceting expectation:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
facet :category_ids
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:facet, :category_ids)
Faceting where a query is excluded:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
category_filter = with(:category_ids, 2)
facet(:category_ids, :exclude => category_filter)
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:facet) {
category_filter = with(:category_ids, 2)
facet(:category_ids, :exclude => category_filter)
}
Query faceting:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
facet(:average_rating) do
row(1.0..2.0) do
with(:average_rating, 1.0..2.0)
end
row(2.0..3.0) do
with(:average_rating, 2.0..3.0)
end
end
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:facet) {
facet(:average_rating) do
row(1.0..2.0) do
with(:average_rating, 1.0..2.0)
end
row(2.0..3.0) do
with(:average_rating, 2.0..3.0)
end
end
}
Field boost matching:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost_fields :body => 2.0
end
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:boost) {
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost_fields :body => 2.0
end
}
Boost query matching:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost(2.0) do
with :blog_id, 4
end
end
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:boost) {
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost(2.0) do
with :blog_id, 4
end
end
}
Boost function matching:
Sunspot.search(Post) do
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost(function { sum(:average_rating, product(:popularity, 10)) })
end
end
Sunspot.session.should have_search_params(:boost) {
keywords 'great pizza' do
boost(function { sum(:average_rating, product(:popularity, 10)) })
end
}
If you are using Test::Unit, the format is similar, but we use
assert_has_search_params
assert_has_no_search_params
assert_is_search_for
assert_is_not_search_for
These are used like:
Sunspot.search([ Post, Blog ]) do
keywords 'great pizza'
end
assert_has_search_params Sunspot.session, :keywords, 'great pizza'
Sunspot.search(Post) do
with :category_ids, 1..3
end
assert_has_search_params Sunspot.session, :with {
with :category_ids, 1..3
}
Sunspot.search(Post) { keywords 'great pizza' }
Sunspot.search([ Post, Blog ]) do
keywords 'great pizza'
end
assert_is_search_for Sunspot.session, Post
assert_is_search_for Sunspot.session, Blog
assert_is_not_search_for Sunspot.session, Person
Check out the test/sunspot_matchers_test.rb for more examples