An AI powered library to find syntax errors in your source code:
DeadEnd: Unmatched `end` detected
This code has an unmatched `end`. Ensure that all `end` lines
in your code have a matching syntax keyword (`def`, `do`, etc.)
and that you don't have any extra `end` lines.
file: path/to/dog.rb
simplified:
3 class Dog
❯ 5 defbark
❯ 7 end
12 end
To automatically search syntax errors when they happen, add this to your Gemfile:
gem 'dead_end'
And then execute:
$ bundle install
If your application is not calling Bundler.require
then you must manually add a require:
require "dead_end"
If you're using rspec add this to your .rspec
file:
--require dead_end
This is needed because people can execute a single test file via
bundle exec rspec path/to/file_spec.rb
and if that file has a syntax error, it won't loadspec_helper.rb
to trigger any requires.
To get the CLI and manually search for syntax errors, install the gem:
$ gem install dead_end
This gives you the CLI command $ dead_end
for more info run $ dead_end --help
.
- Missing
end
:
class Dog
def bark
puts "bark"
def woof
puts "woof"
end
end
# => scratch.rb:8: syntax error, unexpected end-of-input, expecting `end'
- Unexpected
end
class Dog
def speak
@sounds.each |sound| # Note the missing `do` here
puts sound
end
end
end
# => scratch.rb:7: syntax error, unexpected `end', expecting end-of-input
As well as unmatched |
and unmatched }
. These errors can be time consuming to debug because Ruby often only tells you the last line in the file. The command ruby -wc path/to/file.rb
can narrow it down a little bit, but this library does a better job.
I would love to get something like this directly in Ruby, but I first need to prove it's useful. The did_you_mean
functionality started as a gem that was eventually adopted by a bunch of people and then Ruby core liked it enough that they included it in the source. The goal of this gem is to:
- Get real world useage and feedback. If we gave you an awful suggestion, let us know! We try to handle lots of cases well, but maybe we could be better.
- Prove out demand. If you like this idea, then vote for it by putting it in your Gemfile.
This library uses a goal-seeking algorithm similar to that of a path-finding search. For more information read the blog post about how it works under the hood.
We know that source code that does not contain a syntax error can be parsed. We also know that code with a syntax error contains both valid code and invalid code. If you remove the invalid code, then we can programatically determine that the code we removed contained a syntax error. We can do this detection by generating small code blocks and searching for which blocks need to be removed to generate valid source code.
Since there can be multiple syntax errors in a document it's not good enough to check individual code blocks, we've got to check multiple at the same time. We will keep creating and adding new blocks to our search until we detect that our "frontier" (which contains all of our blocks) contains the syntax error. After this, we can stop our search and instead focus on filtering to find the smallest subset of blocks that contain the syntax error.
Here's an example:
After checking out the repo, run bin/setup
to install dependencies. Then, run rake spec
to run the tests. You can also run bin/console
for an interactive prompt that will allow you to experiment.
To install this gem onto your local machine, run bundle exec rake install
. To release a new version, update the version number in version.rb
, and then run bundle exec rake release
, which will create a git tag for the version, push git commits and tags, and push the .gem
file to rubygems.org.
Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/zombocom/dead_end. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the code of conduct.
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.
Everyone interacting in the DeadEnd project's codebases, issue trackers, chat rooms and mailing lists is expected to follow the code of conduct.