/Top-New-York-Providers-Depression-Screening

This code uses data collected for the Physician Quality Reporting System to identify the best medical practices in NY at screening for depression.

Primary LanguagePython

Top-New-York-Providers-Depression-Screening

This code uses data collected for the Physician Quality Reporting System to identify the 10 best medical practices in NY at screening for depression.

The data can be collected at the following URLs:

The data should be placed in the same directory as the python file to run.

Group Practice PAC ID Organization legal name Screening for depression and developing a follow-up plan. Percent Reporting Depression Screening Contact Contact Info
1355395179 FOX REHABILITATION PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES LLC 1045 46% Robyn Kjar, DPT info@foxrehab.org, 877-407-3422
9537213079 GENERAL PHYSICIAN, PC 757 43% Thomas McTernan, MD 716-363-6960
8820070105 ON-SITE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES PC 700 100% Stephen Buckley, PhD onsitepsy@cshore.com, 203-438-7565
5193800779 AMHERST MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLP 470 100% Steven Stone, MD 716-834-4266
7416860572 PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTHCARE, PLLC 400 100% Joel Richman, PhD hr@phcny.com, 315-422-0300
3375434970 STONY BROOK ANAESTHESIOLOGY UNIVERSITY FACULTY... 344 100% Tong Joo (TJ) Gan, MD Tong.Gan@stonybrookmedicine.edu, 631-444-2975
2365494861 DAWN FRIEDLAND-PEREZ LCSW,PC 300 100% Dawn Friedland-Perez, LCSW, PC 631-331-2690
9931164845 EDWARD J. JACOBS, MD., SEAN Y. LEE, M.D. AND C... 252 100% Sean Y. Lee, MD 518-465-3318
5597908202 CNY SPINE AND PAIN MEDICINE LLC 243 75% Martin Schaeffer, MD 315-451-5400
1557416997 AHAVA MEDICAL AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC 200 100% June Mossop, PhD 718-951-8800

The contact column in the results above is not an output of the code, and was added manually.

The results above show the top ten practices in New York based on screening for depression. The values in the “Screening for depression” column are calculated as the sum of the individual scores for each practitioner within the practice. Those individual scores (obtained from the individual EP Public Reporting Data) represent the percent of visits in which the practitioner screened the patient for depression. Thus, a practice-wide score of 400 may represent four practitioners that screen for depression 100% of the time, or eight practitioners that screen for depression 50% of the time. While I gave consideration to calculating practice-wide score based on average, not sum, I believe that using sum is the correct method to identify the practices that are screening the most patients for depression overall.

I first looked at a different dataset that included data for depression screening on a group practice level (https://data.medicare.gov/Physician-Compare/Physician-Compare-2014-Group-Practice-Public-Repor/t6ug-wt53), but using this dataset was more limited than combining the two datasets above (only eight total practices had scores for depression screening).

The code can easily be updated to alter the target state or amount of output. All of the data for specific practitioners can be identified using "screenProviderJoin2.loc[screenProviderJoin2['Group Practice PAC ID'] == 1355395179]" and changing the PAC ID to select the provider of interest.