modified basecalling analysis for m6a modification of RNA
Closed this issue · 2 comments
Seongmin-Jang-1165 commented
Issue Report
Please describe the issue:
Hello developer
I'm planning to analyze m6a modification of RNA using DORADO modified basecalling and Modkit. i generate data wiht SQK - RNA004
Is m6A modified basecalling process based on DRACH motif? or it can figure out de novo motif?
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Please list any steps to reproduce the issue.
Run environment:
- Dorado version:
- Dorado command:
- Operating system:
- Hardware (CPUs, Memory, GPUs):
- Source data type (e.g., pod5 or fast5 - please note we always recommend converting to pod5 for optimal basecalling performance):
- Source data location (on device or networked drive - NFS, etc.):
- Details about data (flow cell, kit, read lengths, number of reads, total dataset size in MB/GB/TB):
- Dataset to reproduce, if applicable (small subset of data to share as a pod5 to reproduce the issue):
Logs
- Please provide output trace of dorado (run dorado with -v, or -vv on a small subset)
malton-ont commented
Models are available for all-context and DRACH, depending on the basecall model:
dorado download --list 2> >(grep m6A)
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_sup@v3.0.1_m6A_DRACH@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_hac@v5.0.0_m6A@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_sup@v5.0.0_m6A@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_hac@v5.0.0_m6A_DRACH@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_sup@v5.0.0_m6A_DRACH@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_hac@v5.1.0_inosine_m6A@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_sup@v5.1.0_inosine_m6A@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_hac@v5.1.0_m6A_DRACH@v1
[2024-11-07 09:15:11.150] [info] - rna004_130bps_sup@v5.1.0_m6A_DRACH@v1
If you are using the v5.1.0 basecall models then the all-context model is inosine_m6A
. If you are only interested in m6A, you can use modkit to remove the inosine calls (with --ignore 17596
), which should achieve similar results to previous m6A models.
Seongmin-Jang-1165 commented
Thanks for advice! i'll try it