Hardens Chromium and it's settings in the name of security
Chromium vs. Firefox
Performance
- Chromium consumes a little bit more memory than Firefox, but starts up faster
- Chromium tends to make better use of multicore systems, using separate processes for each tab. This feature is still in development on Firefox
- The browsers have competitive Javascript performance, but Firefox has better support for the newest javascript features
Features
- Chromium generally supports the latest HTML features sooner
- Firefox generally supports the latest Javascript features sooner
- Both have mobile versions
- Both manage bookmarks
- Both have a useful dashboard startpage
- Firefox is more extensible
- There are countless themes and extensions, and there's an advanced Customize mode to change the placement of anything on the screen.
- Firefox has an advanced user profile system that's easy to backup
- Both support syncing browser data and preferences between multiple installations, including on mobile
- Firefox allows non-tabbed mode, Chromium does not
- Firefox allows traditional style menus, Chromium does not
Extension coverage
- There's Adblock and Flashblock for both but there exist ESR and no-addons builds for FF and Chromium
- Ghostery lacks some blockage on Chromium
- Chromium has a Downloadbar and limited support for Greasemonkey, Tapermonkey Userscripts by default
- The Firefox extension API is far more powerful than Chromium's; every part of the browser can be customized
Plug-ins
- Chromium and Firefox are both trying to deprecate the old insecure and buggy NPAPI plugin system. Chromium uses its own PPAPI system for Flash
- Firefox uses a secure Javascript-based library for reading PDFs
- Firefox is developing a secure Javascript-based replacement for Flash called Shumway, but's dropped since Flash is known to be dying
Data privacy with default settings
- Firefox uses Yahoo as its default search engine in North America, and other search engines in other regions
- Chromium uses Google as its default search engine
- Firefox Sync can be hosted on your own server, and uses a zero-knowledge architecture. Chrome Sync only syncs to Google servers (encrypted).
- Both support private sessions where there is no history saved (private modes)
Data privacy after user configuration
- Both Firefox's and Chromium's extensions may send private/usage data to somewhere (with prior warning)
- You can change the default search engines of both to services like DuckDuckGo
- Users can easily disable features of Chromium that remotely use Google-services
- You can selectively enable Chromium's extensions for private sessions
- You can use NoScript in Firefox and µMatrix (formerly HTTP Switchboard) in Firefox and Chromium to greatly enhance your privacy
- Both support the HTTPS Everywhere extension from the Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Both can be configured to use TOR, but the TOR project recommends configuring Firefox or using the Firefox-based Tor browser
- Firefox allows extensive control over which elements of the browser run and transmit data. These can be changed in the about:config page
- Newer versions of Chromium require you download extensions from the Chrome web store or manually install from a local file
Other stuff
- Official System Hardening Guide
- Official Chromium Security tracker - I'm official supporter/commiter now :)
- Transitioning from SPDY to HTTP/2
- Chrome Vs. Chromium
- The Private Life of Chromium Browsers
- How Chromium works
- BetterFirefox
- Chromium WPAD detection
- Baselines of Web Browsers
- Custom DNS names in Chromium