An extensible data validation library for Elixir.
Can be used to check different data types for compliance with criteria.
Ships with built-in validators to check for attribute presence, absence, inclusion, exclusion, format, length, acceptance, and by a custom function. You can easily define new validators and override existing ones.
- Rails ActiveModel Validations
- Clojure's Validateur
Note the examples below use Vex.valid?/2, with the validations to
check explicitly provided as the second argument. For information on how
validation configuration can be provided as part of a single argument
(eg, packaged with the data to check passed to Vex.valid?/1) see
"Configuring Validations" below.
Note all validations can be skipped based on :if and :unless
conditions given as options. See "Validation Conditions" further below for
more information.
Ensure a value is present:
Vex.valid? post, title: [presence: true]See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Presence for details on
available options.
Ensure a value is absent (blank)
Vex.valid? post, byline: [absence: true]See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Absence for details on
available options.
Ensure a value is in a list of values:
Vex.valid? post, category: [inclusion: ["politics", "food"]]This validation can be skipped for nil or blank values by including
allow_nil: true and/or allow_blank: true.
See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Inclusion for details on available options.
Ensure a value is not in a list of values:
Vex.valid? post, category: [exclusion: ["oped", "lifestyle"]]See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Exclusion for details on available
options.
Ensure a value matches a regular expression:
Vex.valid? widget, identifier: [format: ~r/(^id-)/]This validation can be skipped for nil or blank values by including
allow_nil: true and/or allow_blank: true.
See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Format for details on
available options.
Ensure a value's length is at least a given size:
Vex.valid? user, username: [length: [min: 2]]Ensure a value's length is at or below a given size:
Vex.valid? user, username: [length: [max: 10]]Ensure a value's length is within a range (inclusive):
Vex.valid? user, username: [length: [in: 2..10]]This validation can be skipped for nil or blank values by including
allow_nil: true and/or allow_blank: true.
See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Length for details on
available options.
Ensure an attribute is set to a positive (or custom) value. For use expecially with "acceptance of terms" checkboxes in web applications.
Vex.valid?(user, accepts_terms: [acceptance: true])To check for a specific value, use :as:
Vex.valid?(user, accepts_terms: [acceptance: [as: "yes"]])See the documentation on Vex.Validators.Acceptance for details on
available options.
Ensure a value has a matching confirmation:
Vex.valid? user, password: [confirmation: true]The above would ensure the values of password and
password_confirmation are equivalent.
This validation can be skipped for nil or blank values by
including allow_nil: true and/or allow_blank: true.
See the documentation on Vex.Validators.confirmation for details
on available options.
You can also just provide a custom function for validation instead of a validator name:
Vex.valid?(user, password: fn (pass) -> byte_size(pass) > 4 end)
Vex.valid? user, password: &valid_password?/1
Vex.valid?(user, password: &(&1 != "god"))Instead of returning a boolean the validate function may return :ok
on success, or {:error, "a message"} on error:
Vex.valid?(user, password: fn (password) ->
if valid_password?(p) do
:ok
else
{:error, "#{password} isn't a valid password"}
end
end)Or explicitly using :by:
Vex.valid?(user, age: [by: &(&1 > 18)])This validation can be skipped for nil or blank values by including
allow_nil: true and/or allow_blank: true.
See the documentation on Vex.Validators.By for details on available options.
A validation can be made applicable (or unapplicable) by using the :if
and :unless options.
Note Vex.results will return tuples with :not_applicable for validations that
are skipped as a result of failing conditions.
Require a post to have a body of at least 200 bytes unless a non-blank
reference_url is provided.
iex> Vex.valid?(post, body: [length: [min: 200, unless: :reference_url]])Only require a password if the state of a user is :new:
iex> Vex.valid?(user, password: [presence: [if: [state: :new]]]
Don't require users from Facebook to provide an email address:
iex> Vex.valid?(user, email: [presence: [unless: &User.from_facebook?/1]]
Require users less than 13 years of age to provide a parent's email address:
iex> Vex.valid?(user, parent_email: [presence: [if: &(&1.age < 13)]]
The examples above use Vex.valid?/2, passing both the data to
be validated and the validation settings. This is nice for ad hoc data
validation, but wouldn't it be nice to just:
Vex.valid?(data)... and have the data tell Vex which validations should be evaluated?
In your struct module, use Vex.Struct:
defmodule User do
defstruct username: nil, password: nil, password_confirmation: nil
use Vex.Struct
validates :username, presence: true,
length: [min: 4],
format: ~r/^[[:alpha:]][[:alnum:]]+$/
validates :password, length: [min: 4],
confirmation: true
endNote validates should only be used once per attribute.
Once configured, you can use Vex.valid?/1:
user = %User{username: "actualuser",
password: "abcdefghi",
password_confirmation: "abcdefghi"}
Vex.valid?(user)You can also use valid? directly from the Module:
user |> User.valid?In your list, just include a :_vex entry and use Vex.valid?/1:
user = [username: "actualuser",
password: "abcdefghi",
password_confirmation: "abcdefghi",
_vex: [username: [presence: true,
length: [min: 4],
format: ~r/^[[:alpha:]][[:alnum:]]+$/]],
password: [length: [min: 4], confirmation: true]]
Vex.valid?(user)Just implement the Vex.Extract protocol. Here's what was done to
support keyword lists:
defimpl Vex.Extract, for: List do
def settings(data) do
Keyword.get data, :_vex
end
def attribute(data, name) do
Keyword.get data, name
end
endFor validity, it's the old standard, Vex.valid?/1:
iex> Vex.valid?(user)
true(If you need to pass in the validations to use, do that as a second argument to
Vex.valid?/2)
You can access the raw validation results using Vex.results/1:
iex> Vex.results(user)
[{:ok, :username, :presence},
{:ok, :username, :length},
{:ok, :username, :format}]If you only want the errors, use Vex.errors/1:
iex> Vex.errors(another_user)
[{:error, :password, :length, "must have a length of at least 4"},
{:error, :password, :confirmation, "must match its confirmation"}]Custom error messages can be requested by validations when providing the
:message option and can use EEx to insert fields specific to the validator, eg:
validates :body, length: [min: 4,
tokenizer: &String.split/1,
message: "<%= length tokens %> words isn't enough"]This could yield, in the case of a :body value "hello my darling", the result:
{:error, "3 words isn't enough"}Validators declare a list of the available message fields and their
descriptions by setting the module attribute @message_fields (see
Vex.Validator.ErrorMessage), and the metadata is available for querying:
iex> Vex.Validators.Length.__validator__(:message_fields)
[value: "Bad value", tokens: "Tokens from value", size: "Number of tokens",
min: "Minimum acceptable value", max: "Maximum acceptable value"]Validators are simply modules that implement validate/2 and return :ok
or a tuple with :error and a message. They usually use Vex.Validator
as well to get some common utilities for supporting :allow_nil, :allow_blank, and custom :message options:
defmodule App.CurrencyValidator do
use Vex.Validator
def validate(value, options) do
# Return :ok or {:error, "a message"}
end
endIf you wanted to make this validator available to Vex as the :currency
validator so that you could do this:
validates :amount, currency: trueYou just need to add a validator source so that Vex knows where to find it.
A source can be anything that implements the Vex.Validator.Source protocol.
We'll use a keyword list for this example. The implementation for List
allows us to provide a simple mapping.
Vex uses Application.get_env(:vex, :sources) to retrieve the
configuration of sources, defaulting to [Vex.Validators]. We can
set the configuration with
Mix.Config,
as in:
config :vex,
sources: [[currency: App.CurrencyValidator], Vex.Validators]Vex will consult the list of sources -- in order -- when looking for a
validator. By putting our new source before Vex.Validators, we make it
possible to override the built-in validators.
Note: Without a sources configuration, Vex falls back to a default of [Vex.Validators].
If adding mappings to our keyword list source becomes
tiresome, we can make use of the fact there's a Vex.Validator.Source
implementation for Atom; we can provide a module name as a source instead
(just as Vex does with Vex.Validators).
config :vex,
sources: [App.Validators, Vex.Validators]If given an atom, Vex will assume it refers to a module and try two strategies to retrieve a validator:
- If the module exports a
validator/1function, it will call that function, passing the validator name (eg,:currency) - Otherwise, Vex will assume the validator module is the same as the
source module plus a dot and the camelized validator name (eg, given
a source of
App.Validators, it would look for a:currencyvalidator atApp.Validators.Currency)
In either case it will check the candidate validator for an exported
validate/2 function.
In the event no validators can be found for a name, a
Vex.InvalidValidatorError will be raised.
To see what validator Vex finds for a given validator name, use Vex.validator/1:
iex> Vex.validator(:currency)
App.Validators.CurrencyPlease fork and send pull requests (preferably from non-master branches), including tests (doctests or normal ExUnit.Case tests).
Report bugs and request features via Issues; kudos if you do it from pull requests you submit that fix the bugs or add the features. ;)
Released under the MIT License.
