NTR: 'is contact information for'

Question

NTR: 'is contact information for'

Opened this issue 2 years ago · 9 comments

Note: this relationship is currently in OBIB (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBIB_0000734)

Preferred term label

is contact information about

Textual definition

a is contact information for b, if a is a information content entity, b is a human being or an organization and a identifies a physical location or electronic resource that allows to initiate communication with a.

Term Editor

Mathias Brochhausen

Suggested parent term

is about (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000136)

Answer 1 · 2023-04-25T16:38:49.000Z

Should the name be 'is contact information for' or 'is contact information about'? The former seems to make more sense.

Can someone from OBIB please join the next call to discuss?

Answer 2 · 2023-06-20T14:28:19.000Z

Any updates on this?

Answer 3 · 2023-06-22T19:15:32.000Z

Per 6-22 OBIB call, 'is contact information for' makes more sense.

If there aren't any other comments, @jmwhorton will make the pull request.

Answer 4 · 2023-07-17T13:18:00.000Z

Hi @jmwhorton
I'm just checking up on this.

Answer 5 · 2023-07-17T13:21:39.000Z

Hello! Pull request is still incoming, should have some time this week.

Answer 6 · 2023-07-26T15:03:42.000Z

@wdduncan What is the ID I should use for this term? Thanks.

Answer 7 · 2023-07-27T16:43:09.000Z

@jmwhorton Please use RO_0017007.

Answer 8 · 2024-01-10T14:20:33.000Z

This seems like an annotation property and should be added to the OBO Metadata Ontology (OMO) instead.

Answer 9 · 2024-02-22T20:36:28.000Z

Can you please clarify. My understanding was all relations go into the relation ontology. Did that change? thx