okfn/opendefinition

Issues

• Design update to match new OKFN brand guidelines

  #221 opened 8 months ago by lucpretti
  0

• Wrong SPDX identifier for older Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licenses

  #218 opened a year ago by nicoroeser
  1

• Deutschlandlizenz ( Data Licence Germany) 2.0: missing SPDX IDs perhaps not missing?

  #216 opened a year ago by GDIAnja
  2

• My

  #215 opened 2 years ago by Rssmy
  0

• Document discussion/approval of submitted licenses with links on /licenses/

  #212 opened 3 years ago by mlinksva
  0

• okfn-discuss doesn't exist anymore but approval process cites it

  #197 opened 4 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• Maximise should be maximize

  #196 opened 4 years ago by eberlyn
  2

• Consider evaluation of licensing terms and best practices for their declaration

  #194 opened 5 years ago by mellybelly
  1

• Older versions are not accessible?

  #190 opened 5 years ago by mandrasch
  1

• www & licenses sub domains unavailable

  #181 opened 6 years ago by stuzart
  5

• Adding the EPL v2 to the list of known licences

  #185 opened 6 years ago by borisbaldassari
  1

• OD site should use https

  #62 opened 6 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• Rename "Indonesian" to "Bahasa Indonesia"

  #179 opened 6 years ago by jfushada
  1

• Open Definition 2.1 in Spanish

  #175 opened 7 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  1

• An open licence should be published openly

  #177 opened 7 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  9

• Definitions' dates?

  #174 opened 7 years ago by ccamara
  2

• Uncool URL

  #166 opened 7 years ago by kannes
  0

• A few broken license pages

  #160 opened 7 years ago by justinclift
  4

• Guide to Open Data Licensing: next steps

  #145 opened 8 years ago by pietercolpaert
  10

• Typo on http://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/

  #154 opened 8 years ago by danfowler
  0

• Broken second-level markdown headers

  #153 opened 8 years ago by danfowler
  2

• "Source" link broken

  #151 opened 8 years ago by danfowler
  0

• Open Knowledge -> Open Knowledge International

  #152 opened 8 years ago by danfowler
  0

• Legal details for Australia are incorrect

  #146 opened 8 years ago by pietercolpaert
  12

• assets.okfn.org cookies cause privacybadger to block OK header image

  #126 opened 8 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• Link previous OD versions somewhere

  #79 opened 8 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• how to add new translation?

  #132 opened 9 years ago by ppKrauss
  4

• /od redirect to stable url for current version?

  #63 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  2

• tighten up 1.3 Open Format

  #68 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  19

• Open Format Definition and a Conformant open formats page

  #93 opened 9 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  9

• Open Definition is a pirated work without proper attribution

  #110 opened 9 years ago by BrucePerens
  8

• Open Buttons do not pass colour contrast accessibility

  #81 opened 9 years ago by stevensimon
  5

• Rename /buttons/ to /badges/

  #74 opened 9 years ago by rufuspollock
  5

• Open work checklist and badging

  #119 opened 9 years ago by rufuspollock
  1

• merge master into gh-pages

  #109 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• Towards an Open Definition clause for law

  #114 opened 9 years ago by ppKrauss
  12

• Document use of may/must etc

  #65 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  3

• Should 2.1 include some minimum standard of compatility with existing licenses?

  #77 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  2

• clarify "fee/libre/open source software tool" in 1.3

  #75 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  2

• "no charge" section could be clarified

  #64 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  1

• "should... where possible" in 1.3 Open Format definition

  #95 opened 9 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  2

• 2.1 - consistent formatting of "must"

  #96 opened 9 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  0

• 2.1 - Section 1.2 - replace "preferably" with "should"

  #97 opened 9 years ago by Stephen-Gates
  1

• Link rot and licensing on PDDL page

  #98 opened 9 years ago by Daniel-Mietchen
  1

• Apparently it is possible to misread OD 2.0 as allowing DRM'd works. It does not but 2.1 should be harder to misread.

  #76 opened 9 years ago by mlinksva
  3

• Translation in Right to Left Languages

  #86 opened 9 years ago by bluechi
  2

• Name of the definition in translation

  #78 opened 9 years ago by tarkowski
  2

• /od/ and /od/2.0/en/ out of sync

  #71 opened 10 years ago by patrickhoefler
  2

• Surely licenses *must* include modifiers required to exercise rights?

  #69 opened 10 years ago by lofidevops
  2

• page not being generated for Spanish Translation

  #66 opened 10 years ago by hlainchb
  0