Issues
- 3
Enforce S0(Again) < S0(Hard) < S0(Good) < S0(Easy)
#133 opened by Expertium - 2
Change l1 = np.abs(stability - init_s0) / 16
#144 opened by Expertium - 5
- 0
In the stability charts, change RMSE to MAPE
#130 opened by Expertium - 2
`optimizer.create_time_series` raises Exception
#125 opened by YukiNagat0 - 2
try ruff in ci?
#119 opened by asukaminato0721 - 1
Q: Effect of review_duration column on weights
#118 opened by joshdavham - 13
[Feature request] Further improving the estimation of reviews times for calculating minimum recommended retention
#116 opened by Expertium - 2
- 8
- 4
- 18
- 12
Optimized w[3] too low
#69 opened by user1823 - 16
- 13
- 5
[Feature Request] Loosen the clampings for w[9]
#30 opened by Expertium - 12
- 12
[Question] Explain how the optimizer calculates retention that minimizes review times
#38 opened by Expertium - 1
[Bug] Can't use absolute path as arg
#43 opened by tkngaejcpi - 1
- 0
[Feature Request] make the simulator more precise by using different values of recall_cost for Hard, Good and Easy
#41 opened by Expertium - 5
Training data is inadequate.
#36 opened by mdzz2048 - 1
- 5
[BUG] Loosen the clamping for w[10] and w[8]
#28 opened by L-M-Sherlock - 58
- 1
- 2
- 8
- 26
how to input data from obsidian-spaced-repetition-recall, ob-revlog.csv, into optimizer
#13 opened by dryezl - 24
[BUG] Initial stability for "Good" will be larger than for "Easy" if "Good" has more datapoint
#11 opened by L-M-Sherlock - 61
- 2
[BUG] Optimizer error: "stack expects each tensor to be equal size, but got [...] at entry 0 and [...] at entry 1"
#9 opened by Zaldroc8 - 0