openid/sharedsignals

jwt-id should be jwt_id

Closed this issue · 1 comments

Currently the spec uses jwt-id to describe the JWT ID simple subject format. This is at odds with all of the other simple subject formats that use underscores, like saml_assertion_id, iss_sub and phone_number.

And, in one of the CAEP examples we use the underscore as would be expected. We should update the SSF spec to use jwt_id.

tulshi commented

closed via pull req 63