paboldin/meltdown-exploit

Issues

• Non-vulnerable CPU/kernels list

  #22 opened 7 years ago by pm-cz
  198

• 5.19.0-41-generic | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz

  #77 opened 2 years ago by MottiKumar
  0

• Test on Windows ?

  #76 opened 2 years ago by Hawk2811
  0

• AMD Athlon(tm) Neo X2 Dual Core Processor L325

  #75 opened 2 years ago by krascovict
  0

• Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2830 @ 2.16GHz

  #74 opened 3 years ago by krascovict
  0

• what does the pread() function do

  #73 opened 4 years ago by henry1833
  0

• i7-9750H

  #72 opened 4 years ago by leecos0212
  0

• Not Vulnerable

  #71 opened 4 years ago by itsvishal7
  0

• CPU

  #70 opened 5 years ago by Abdelkad3r
  0

• Intel(R) Celeron(R) M CPU 530 @ 1.73GHz VULNERABLE ON

  #69 opened 5 years ago by krascovict
  0

• Thank you! paboldin

  #68 opened 5 years ago by ehgus607
  0

• Meltdown as KASLR bypass

  #67 opened 5 years ago by bcoles
  0

• Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5800 @ 2.00GHz

  #66 opened 5 years ago by edsonjt81
  0

• Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz

  #65 opened 6 years ago by PramodJose
  0

• Confusion about part of the assembly code.

  #64 opened 7 years ago by howardzhang87
  1

• Is there another way to fully cache the target memory without using pread()?

  #61 opened 7 years ago by howardzhang87
  1

• continue.... root cause...

  #62 opened 7 years ago by moliam
  2

• will not work on Manjaro Linux

  #28 opened 7 years ago by ds2k5
  4

• root cause of the meltdown and spectre vulnerability

  #57 opened 7 years ago by moliam
  8

• Question regarding making and running on 32-bit CPU

  #60 opened 7 years ago by DigTron
  3

• Suggestion: add another standard location of System.map

  #59 opened 7 years ago by sfzhi
  1

• Not Vulnerable

  #58 opened 7 years ago by jclanuza
  1

• again 32bit: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘_mm_mfence’

  #31 opened 7 years ago by eexexiexit
  2

• Check if the kernel is patched against Meltdown

  #56 opened 7 years ago by davidebeatrici
  1

• run.sh add a --loop option so it runs the test in a loop

  #55 opened 7 years ago by dshmgh
  2

• Intel told me this system was not vulnerable, but your tool says it is

  #54 opened 7 years ago
  2

• Fedora 27 on Intel Core I5 - Dell virtual VMWare

  #52 opened 7 years ago by paulosgf
  1

• VULNERABLE ON

  #47 opened 7 years ago by lovefst
  1

• why must the random sequence is used in check()?

  #46 opened 7 years ago by phantomgps1
  1

• Sometimes says my system is not vulnerable

  #49 opened 7 years ago by bobpaul
  1

• Can`t compile on RPI - Raspbian.

  #30 opened 7 years ago by takenek
  5

• Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz

  #35 opened 7 years ago by skypce
  1

• No linux_proc_banner in /proc/kallsyms

  #26 opened 7 years ago by maxux
  5

• VULNERABLE ON

  #38 opened 7 years ago by dgomez
  2

• VULNERABLE ON

  #42 opened 7 years ago by carlecenillee
  1

• Issue 19

  #39 opened 7 years ago by ishamfazal
  2

• Details about my notebook.

  #43 opened 7 years ago by agenteph
  1

• VULNERABLE ON

  #44 opened 7 years ago by dgomez
  0

• Linux kernel version

  #45 opened 7 years ago by HighFish87
  1

• Doesn't build on gcc 4.4.7

  #25 opened 7 years ago by izobara
  5

• it doesn't really work with other memory address than that is in the PoC

  #41 opened 7 years ago by iddq
  2

• i5-4690k Ubuntu 16.04.3

  #40 opened 7 years ago by lukelane124
  0

• VPS

  #36 opened 7 years ago by kroli
  0

• Kali VM

  #37 opened 7 years ago by kroli
  0

• compile error on SuSE Enterprise 11 SP4 - x86intrin.h: No such file or directory

  #29 opened 7 years ago by ds2k5
  1

• Explains about little assembly code

  #33 opened 7 years ago by OtacilioNeto
  1

• vulnerable i5

  #27 opened 7 years ago by fachinformatiker
  0

• Does not build on 64bit gcc 4.7.2

  #23 opened 7 years ago by sergey-dryabzhinsky
  3

• false positive due to missing System.map ? (ie. awk: fatal: cannot open file ) AND using same exit code of 1 for usage() and vulnerable detection

  #21 opened 7 years ago
  4

• find_linux_proc_banner does not work on Debian

  #24 opened 7 years ago by pali
  1