palkan/action_policy-graphql

Issues

• [How to] authorize specific arguments in a mutation

  #50 opened 5 months ago by Tao-Galasse
  1

• Using Class-level authorization does not work

  #52 opened 5 months ago by ofnhwx
  1

• Action policy scoping unable to deal with promises returned from graphql fragment cache library

  #51 opened 6 months ago by linstantnoodles
  4

• Field extensions should not modify options hash

  #49 opened a year ago by gael-ian
  1

• Issue with action policy 0.6.6: `undefined method 'relation_scope'`

  #48 opened a year ago by olivierbuffon
  2

• ActionPolicy does not work well with graphql-ruby dataloaders (not thread/fiber safe)

  #47 opened 2 years ago by Bertg
  7

• Unable to override `authorization_namespace`

  #46 opened 2 years ago by Tyflomate
  11

• expose_authorization_rules with custom context

  #45 opened 3 years ago by AlexeyAbdulmanov
  0

• Using authorized_scope on input

  #22 opened 5 years ago by lifeiscontent
  7

• how to authorize scope at resolver level

  #44 opened 4 years ago by lifeiscontent
  3

• Upgrading graphql Gem to 1.12.4 Causes Connection Error

  #42 opened 4 years ago by Petercopter
  1

• Figure out mutation/resolver input or arguments authorization

  #24 opened 5 years ago by palkan
  5

• Modules reloading works incorrectly in development

  #38 opened 4 years ago by rzaharenkov
  1

• Can ruby-next be a development-only dependency like action_policy?

  #40 opened 4 years ago by haines
  2

• NoMethodError: undefined method `authorize_mutation_raise_exception'

  #36 opened 4 years ago by rzaharenkov
  0

• AuthorizedField is included (prepended) multiple time into field class

  #34 opened 4 years ago by rzaharenkov
  0

• initializer to set defaults of query and mutations

  #14 opened 4 years ago by lifeiscontent
  0

• verify_authorized

  #28 opened 4 years ago by pdfrod
  2

• Exposed authorization rules can't be accessed without user context

  #29 opened 4 years ago by neiljohari
  5

• Raise AuthorizationContextMissing before resolving

  #33 opened 4 years ago by kaka-ruto
  8

• `expose_authorization_rules` Changes

  #25 opened 4 years ago by lifeiscontent
  4

• can_create_object? permission location

  #30 opened 4 years ago by jimmytang
  2

• Lack of expose_authorization_rules for Interface

  #32 opened 4 years ago by amkisko
  2

• Allow to use proc for authorized_scope

  #31 opened 4 years ago by dmitry
  1

• Handle record with preauthorize?

  #27 opened 5 years ago by marlosirapuan
  2

• Graphql context in Policies?

  #26 opened 5 years ago by marlosirapuan
  2

• no examples of authorized_scope with relay connection type

  #21 opened 5 years ago by lifeiscontent
  7

• authorize! method doesn't work inside mutation

  #18 opened 5 years ago by psemehen
  1

• Does this work with GraphQL::Relay::Mutation's resolver?

  #15 opened 5 years ago by juhaelee
  1

• preauthorize doesn't default to expected values

  #13 opened 5 years ago by lifeiscontent
  4

• Howto setup for graphql ruby 1.9.14

  #11 opened 5 years ago by lifeiscontent
  3

• Make field extension more flexible

  #9 opened 5 years ago by palkan
  0

• Authorize before fetching data

  #6 opened 5 years ago by alexander37137
  6

• Using authorized_scope with authorize

  #8 opened 5 years ago by alexander37137
  3

• More releases or beta branch?

  #5 opened 5 years ago by destructobeam
  3

• Best practice of record list / create permissions exposition and authorization

  #4 opened 5 years ago by dmitry
  3

• Support resolver

  #2 opened 5 years ago by dmitry
  2