petrelharp/context

test json-tree-cpg

Opened this issue · 2 comments

And, I'll take you up on your previous offer: I would like to test
json-tree-cpg in a similar way to json-cpg; could you add that in? I
would, but it isn't as straightforward as adding another file to
nestly/models/, as some of the calls and options are different:
fit-tree-model.R rather than fit-model.R, and make-genmat takes no -o
flag, as the location of the genmats is specified in the config file.

Hello Peter--

It seems to me that this is the first instance of a path being specified in a config file. It seems to me good to keep it that way unless there is a solid reason to change this and the CLI of all of the tools to accomodate several genmats. What if I changed things to save the several genmats into one .RData file, such that we could keep things as they are?

Thanks!

Hm, so: changing make-genmat.R to store in a single file everything needed
for the tree? That sounds like a good idea. Perhaps it should also do the
setup done by peel.transmat, since that is shared in common by anything
with the same tree as well; then the thing that is being stored is still a
single object.

-p

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Erick Matsen notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hello Peter--

It seems to me that this is the first instance of a path being specified
in a config file. It seems to me good to keep it that way unless there is a
solid reason to change this and the CLI of all of the tools to accomodate
several genmats. What if I changed things to save the several genmats into
one .RData file, such that we could keep things as they are?

Thanks!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#36 (comment).