A mocking libary for the Elixir language.
We use the Erlang meck library to provide module mocking functionality for Elixir. It uses macros in Elixir to expose the functionality in a convenient manner for integrating in Elixir tests.
See the full reference documentation.
First, add mock to your mix.exs
dependencies:
def deps do
[{:mock, "~> 0.1.1", only: :test}]
end
and run $ mix deps.get
.
The Mock library provides the with_mock
macro for running tests with
mocks.
For a simple example, if you wanted to test some code which calls
HTTPotion.get
to get a webpage but without actually fetching the
webpage you could do something like this.
defmodule MyTest do
use ExUnit.Case, async: false
import Mock
test "test_name" do
with_mock HTTPotion, [get: fn(_url) -> "<html></html>" end] do
HTTPotion.get("http://example.com")
# Tests that make the expected call
assert called HTTPotion.get("http://example.com")
end
end
end
And you can mock up multiple modules with with_mocks
.
opts
List of optional arguments passed to meck. :passthrough
will
passthrough arguments to the original module. Pass []
as opts
if you don't
need this.
defmodule MyTest do
use ExUnit.Case, async: false
import Mock
test "multiple mocks" do
with_mocks([
{HashDict,
[],
[get: fn(%{}, "http://example.com") -> "<html></html>" end]},
{String,
[],
[reverse: fn(x) -> 2*x end,
length: fn(_x) -> :ok end]}
]) do
assert HashDict.get(%{}, "http://example.com") == "<html></html>"
assert String.reverse(3) == 6
assert String.length(3) == :ok
end
end
end
An additional convenience macro test_with_mock
is supplied which
internally delegates to with_mock
. Allowing the above test to be
written as follows:
defmodule MyTest do
use ExUnit.Case, async: false
import Mock
test_with_mock "test_name", HTTPotion,
[get: fn(_url) -> "<html></html>" end] do
HTTPotion.get("http://example.com")
assert called HTTPotion.get("http://example.com")
end
end
The test_with_mock
macro can also be passed a context argument
allowing the sharing of information between callbacks and the test
defmodule MyTest do
use ExUnit.Case, async: false
import Mock
setup do
doc = "<html></html>"
{:ok, doc: doc}
end
test_with_mock "test_with_mock with context", %{doc: doc}, HTTPotion, [],
[get: fn(_url, _headers) -> doc end] do
HTTPotion.get("http://example.com", [foo: :bar])
assert called HTTPotion.get("http://example.com", :_)
end
end
The with_mock
creates a mock module. The keyword list provides a set
of mock implementation for functions we want to provide in the mock (in
this case just get
). Inside with_mock
we exercise the test code
and we can check that the call was made as we expected using called
and
providing the example of the call we expected (the second argument :_
has a
special meaning of matching anything).
You can also pass the option :passthrough
to retain the original module
functionality. For example
defmodule MyTest do
use ExUnit.Case, async: false
import Mock
test_with_mock "test_name", IO, [:passthrough], [] do
IO.puts "hello"
assert called IO.puts "hello"
end
end
Currently, mocking modules cannot be done asynchronously, so make sure that you
are not using async: true
in any module where you are testing.
Also, because of the way mock overrides the module, it must be defined in a seperate file from the test file.
The use of mocking can be somewhat controversial. I personally think that it works well for certain types of tests. Certainly, you should not overuse it. It is best to write as much as possible of your code as pure functions which don't require mocking to test. However, when interacting with the real world (or web services, users etc.) sometimes side-effects are necessary. In these cases, mocking is one useful approach for testing this functionality.
Also, note that Mock has a global effect so if you are using Mocks in multiple
tests set async: false
so that only one test runs at a time.
Open an issue.
I'd welcome suggestions for improvements or bugfixes. Just open an issue.