printer can be better implemented with variant?
Closed this issue · 3 comments
straszheim commented
maybe we can get a visitor thing going with variants instead of specifying a type name as a string
ethanrublee commented
Ah good idea.
ethanrublee commented
Would be interesting to implement with out requiring the user to have variant types on their output. Wonder what the support of any -> variant is?
straszheim commented
no such support exists
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:07 PM, ethanrublee
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Would be interesting to implement with out requiring the user to have variant types on their output. Wonder what the support of any -> variant is?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#35 (comment)