Welcome to The Worst Chess Game Ever! This project brings you an intentionally terrible chess game that can be played mathematically. 🎉🙈
This project aims to create a hilarious and challenging chess play that will blow your mind by its stupidity. With Python 3.10.6, Stockfish as the chess engine, and the "chess" library for Python, we have created a game that will surely frustrate even the most experienced chess players. 🤯🔀
- Horrendous AI: The AI in this game is intentionally designed to make the worst possible moves, leading to unpredictable and nonsensical gameplay. Expect the unexpected! 😱
- Mathematical Approach: Instead of relying on human-like decision-making, our game uses mathematical calculations to determine moves, resulting in a truly unique and mind-boggling chess experience. 🔢🧠
- Stockfish Integration: We have integrated the powerful Stockfish chess engine to assist with move calculations. Even though this AI is powerful, it is equally powerful the other way, creating the worst moves possible. 🐟🤦♂️
- Python 3.10.6: The game is developed using Python 3.10.6. Make sure you have it installed on your system.
- Stockfish: The Stockfish chess engine is a crucial component of this project. Please follow the installation instructions for your operating system: Stockfish GitHub Repository.
pip install stockfish
- "chess" Library: We utilize the "chess" library for Python, which provides useful functionalities for chess-related operations. Install it by running the following command:
pip install chess
The main idea behind this project is to abuse move = stockfish.get_top_moves(n)
function that returns N first moves of Stockfish evaluation. So, we should take a bigger value of those possible moves. For e.g.: worst_move = stockfish.get_top_moves(60)
. Now, we should understand, that this func. returns a dictionary of moves. So, we could extract the last move from this list. So, this line looks like this: worst_move = stockfish.get_top_moves(60)[-1]
I could increase the N value of this func. but this is not so necessary in my opinion. 60 wil be enough.