Perforator
Perforator is a tool for recording performance metrics over subregions of a
program (e.g., functions) using the Linux "perf" interface. The perf
tool
provided by the Linux kernel only supports collecting statistics over the
complete lifetime of a program, which is often inconvenient when a program
includes setup and cleanup that should not be profiled along with the
benchmark. Perforator is not as comprehensive as perf
but it allows you to
collect statistics for individual functions or address ranges.
Perforator only supports Linux AMD64. The target ELF binary may be generated from any language. For function lookup, make sure the binary is not stripped (it must contain a symbol table), and for additional information (source code regions, inlined function lookup), the binary must include DWARF information. Perforator supports position-independent binaries.
Perforator is primarily intended to be used as a CLI tool, but includes a
library for more general user-code tracing called utrace
, a library for
reading ELF/DWARF information from executables, and a library for tracing perf
events in processes.
Installation
There are three ways to install Perforator.
-
Download the prebuilt binary from the releases page.
-
Install from source:
git clone https://github.com/zyedidia/perforator
cd perforator
make build # or make install to install to $GOBIN
- Install with
go get
(version info will be missing):
go get github.com/zyedidia/perforator/cmd/perforator
Usage
First make sure that you have the appropriate permissions to record the events
you are interested in (this may require running Perforator with sudo
or
modifying /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
-- see this
post).
If Perforator still can't find any events, double check that your system
supports the perf_event_open
system call (try installing the perf
tool from
the Linux kernel).
Example
Suppose we had a C function that summed an array and wanted to benchmark it for some large array of numbers. We could write a small benchmark program like so:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#define SIZE 10000000
uint64_t sum(uint32_t* numbers) {
uint64_t sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) {
sum += numbers[i];
}
return sum;
}
int main() {
srand(time(NULL));
uint32_t* numbers = malloc(SIZE * sizeof(uint32_t));
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) {
numbers[i] = rand();
}
uint64_t result = sum(numbers);
printf("%lu\n", result);
return 0;
}
If we want to determine the number of cache misses, branch mispredictions, etc... perf
is not suitable because running perf stat
on this program will profile the creation of
the array in addition to the sum. With Perforator, we can measure just the sum.
Profiling functions
First compile with
$ gcc -g -O2 -o bench bench.c
Now we can measure with Perforator:
$ perforator -r sum ./bench
+---------------------+-------------+
| Event | Count (sum) |
+---------------------+-------------+
| instructions | 50000004 |
| branch-instructions | 10000002 |
| branch-misses | 10 |
| cache-references | 1246340 |
| cache-misses | 14984 |
| time-elapsed | 4.144814ms |
+---------------------+-------------+
10736533065142551
Results are printed immediately when the profiled function returns.
Note: in this case we compiled with -g
to include DWARF debugging
information. This was necessary because GCC will inline the call to sum
, so
Perforator needs to be able to read the DWARF information to determine where it
was inlined to. If you compile without -g
make sure the target function is
not being inlined (either you know it is not inlined, or you mark it with the
noinline
attribute).
Fun fact: clang does a better job optimizing this code than gcc. I tried running this example with clang instead and found it only had 1,250,000 branch instructions (roughly 8x fewer than gcc!). The reason: vector instructions.
Events
By default, Perforator will measure some basic events such as instructions
executed, cache references, cache misses, branches, branch misses. You can
specify events yourself with the -e
flag:
$ perforator -e l1d-read-accesses,l1d-read-misses -r sum ./bench
+-------------------+-------------+
| Event | Count (sum) |
+-------------------+-------------+
| l1d-read-accesses | 10010311 |
| l1d-read-misses | 625399 |
| time-elapsed | 4.501523ms |
+-------------------+-------------+
10736888439771461
To view available events, use the --list
flag:
$ perforator --list hardware # List hardware events
$ perforator --list software # List software events
$ perforator --list cache # List cache events
$ perforator --list trace # List kernel trace events
Detailed documentation for each event is available in the manual page for
Perforator. See the perforator.1
manual included with the prebuilt binary.
The man
directory in the source code contains the Markdown source, which can
be compiled using Pandoc (via make perforator.1
).
Source code regions
In additional to profiling functions, you may profile regions specified by source code ranges if your binary has DWARF debugging information.
$ perforator -r bench.c:18-bench.c:23 ./bench
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
| Event | Count (bench.c:18-bench.c:23) |
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
| instructions | 668794280 |
| branch-instructions | 169061639 |
| branch-misses | 335360 |
| cache-references | 945581 |
| cache-misses | 3569 |
| time-elapsed | 78.433272ms |
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
10737167007294257
Only certain line numbers are available for breakpoints. The range is exclusive
on the upper bound, meaning that in the example above bench.c:23
is not
included in profiling.
You may also directly specify addresses as decimal or hexadecimal numbers. This
is useful if you don't have DWARF information but you know the addresses you
want to profile (for example, by inspecting the disassembly via objdump
).
Multiple regions
You can also profile multiple regions at once:
$ perforator -r bench.c:18-bench.c:23 -r sum -r main ./bench
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
| Event | Count (bench.c:18-bench.c:23) |
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
| instructions | 697120715 |
| branch-instructions | 162949718 |
| branch-misses | 302849 |
| cache-references | 823087 |
| cache-misses | 3645 |
| time-elapsed | 78.832332ms |
+---------------------+-------------------------------+
+---------------------+-------------+
| Event | Count (sum) |
+---------------------+-------------+
| instructions | 49802557 |
| branch-instructions | 10000002 |
| branch-misses | 9 |
| cache-references | 1246639 |
| cache-misses | 14382 |
| time-elapsed | 4.235705ms |
+---------------------+-------------+
10739785644063349
+---------------------+--------------+
| Event | Count (main) |
+---------------------+--------------+
| instructions | 675150939 |
| branch-instructions | 184259174 |
| branch-misses | 386503 |
| cache-references | 1128637 |
| cache-misses | 8368 |
| time-elapsed | 83.132829ms |
+---------------------+--------------+
In this case, it may be useful to use the --summary
option, which will
aggregate all results into a table that is printed when tracing stops.
$ perforator --summary -r bench.c:19-bench.c:24 -r sum -r main ./bench
10732787118410148
+-----------------------+--------------+---------------------+---------------+------------------+--------------+--------------+
| region | instructions | branch-instructions | branch-misses | cache-references | cache-misses | time-elapsed |
+-----------------------+--------------+---------------------+---------------+------------------+--------------+--------------+
| bench.c:18-bench.c:23 | 718946520 | 172546336 | 326000 | 833098 | 3616 | 81.798381ms |
| main | 678365328 | 174259806 | 363737 | 1115394 | 4403 | 86.321344ms |
| sum | 43719896 | 10000002 | 9 | 1248069 | 16931 | 4.453342ms |
+-----------------------+--------------+---------------------+---------------+------------------+--------------+--------------+
You can use the --sort-key
and --reverse-sort
options to modify which
columns are sorted and how. In addition, you can use the --csv
option to
write the output table in CSV form.
Note: to an astute observer, the results from the above table don't look very
accurate. In particular the totals for the main function seem questionable.
This is due to event multiplexing (explained more below), and for best results
you should not profile multiple regions simultaneously. In the table above, you
can see that it's likely that profiling for main
was disabled while sum
was
running.
Groups
The CPU has a fixed number of performance counters. If you try recording more
events than there are counters, "multiplexing" will be performed to estimate
the totals for all the events. For example, if we record 6 events on the sum
benchmark, the instruction count becomes less stable. This is because the
number of events now exceeds the number of hardware registers for counting, and
multiplexing occurs. To ensure that certain events are always counted together,
you can put them all in a group with the -g
option. The -g
option has the
same syntax as the -e
option, but may be specified multiple times (for
multiple groups).
Notes and caveats
- Tip: enable verbose mode with the
-V
flag when you are not seeing the expected result. - Many CPUs expose additional/non-standardized raw perf events. Perforator does not currently support those events.
- Perforator has only limited support for multithreaded programs. It supports
profiling programs with multiple threads as long as it is the case that each
profiled region is only run by one thread (ever). In addition, the beginning
and end of a region must be run by the same thread. This means if you are
benchmarking Go you should call
runtime.LockOSThread
in your benchmark to prevent a goroutine migration while profiling. - A region is either active or inactive, it cannot be active multiple times at once. This means for recursive functions only the first invocation of the function is tracked.
- Be careful of multiplexing, which occurs when you are trying to record more
events than there are hardware counter registers. In particular, if you
profile a function inside of another function being profiled, this will
likely result in multiplexing and possibly incorrect counts. Perforator will
automatically attempt to scale counts when multiplexing occurs. To see if
this has happened, use the
-V
flag, which will print information when multiplexing is detected. - Be careful if your target functions are being inlined. Perforator will
automatically attempt to read DWARF information to determine the inline sites
for target functions but it's a good idea to double check if you are seeing
weird results. Use the
-V
flag to see where Perforator thinks the inline site is.
How it works
Perforator uses ptrace
to trace the target program and enable profiling for
certain parts of the target program. Perforator places the 0xCC
"interrupt"
instruction at the beginning of the profiled function which allows it to regain
control when the function is executed. At that point, Perforator will place the
original code back (whatever was initially overwritten by the interrupt byte),
determine the return address by reading the top of the stack, and place an
interrupt byte at that address. Then Perforator will enable profiling and
resume the target process. When the next interrupt happens, the target will
have reached the return address and Perforator can stop profiling, remove the
interrupt, and place a new interrupt back at the start of the function.