quicwg/ops-drafts

Issues

• IESG review Martin Duke: Section 14 - VN section

  #468 opened 3 years ago by mirjak
  0

• IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 7 - ack strategy

  #473 opened 3 years ago by mirjak
  6

• IESG Review Paul Wouters: section 3.2 - NATs and keep-alives

  #472 opened 3 years ago by mirjak
  2

• IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 2 - fallback

  #471 opened 3 years ago by mirjak
  2

• Caution that there are other protocols that amplify in packets and bytes

  #399 opened 3 years ago by ianswett
  16

• failover vs fail over vs fallback

  #453 opened 3 years ago by britram
  0

• editorial fixes from OPSDIR review

  #454 opened 3 years ago by britram
  0

• Editorial issues identified in GENART review

  #452 opened 3 years ago by britram
  0

• clarify the TAPS context in this document

  #402 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• Clarificaton on any transport- and application-layer delay in RTT measurements

  #416 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  5

• Interpretation of recommendations need clarification in abstract and/or Introduction

  #408 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  6

• Flow control ref to RFC9000

  #405 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  3

• How does conection migration impacts the per-flow basis flow treatment?

  #422 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  6

• lower timeout experienced by QUIC endpoints

  #419 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  2

• Otherthan HTTP3 whatelse have already been defined and deployed over QUIC?

  #413 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• Clarification on allowed encryption schemes

  #406 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  5

• Non-adaptive application faking as QUIC flow to avoid UDP traffic blocking or filtering or throtlling.

  #421 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  2

• UDP Ports and QUIC version

  #428 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  6

• something for appllicablity draft instead?

  #415 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  2

• RFC9000 has better figure than what we have here

  #411 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  3

• Referecne to fast resumption mechanism

  #427 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  5

• Clarification on application binding external state to the connection

  #404 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• end-of-flow or end-of-connection?

  #418 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  1

• What does padding do to the observablity or manageblity?

  #412 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• Update Acknowledgment Efficiency Text isn't great.

  #401 opened 3 years ago by gorryfair
  0

• right ref to amplification attack description?

  #420 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  1

• Clarify CE marking is observed at IP packet header

  #417 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• what is a pure-acknowledgment (ACK) packet?

  #414 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• Clarification on troubleshooting and in-network modification is needed in the introduction

  #410 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  1

• Clarify control signal is QUIC protocol control signal

  #409 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  1

• duplicate reference entries in the manageablity draft

  #423 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  0

• Normative references in Applicablity document

  #407 opened 3 years ago by zaheduzzaman
  1

• Update references to QUIC RFCs

  #397 opened 3 years ago by LPardue
  0

• Double-check contributors

  #391 opened 3 years ago by mirjak
  0

• Ports and ALPN

  #393 opened 3 years ago by huitema
  2

• Manageability: SNI extraction assumes a single CRYPTO frame

  #358 opened 4 years ago by DavidSchinazi
  5

• 1 ALPN per version.

  #360 opened 4 years ago by martinduke
  8

• Clarify coalescing and multiple packets in "The QUIC Handshake" section

  #352 opened 4 years ago by ianswett
  6

• Nits for applicability

  #382 opened 4 years ago by larseggert
  0

• Applicability: Two more aspects of setting DSCPs

  #369 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  1

• Are client-requested Connection IDs atypical?

  #354 opened 4 years ago by MikeBishop
  2

• Manageability: Detailed Review Comments - NiTs

  #362 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  5

• Manageability: does the endpoint change address using a NAPT?

  #364 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  1

• Nits for manageability

  #381 opened 4 years ago by larseggert
  1

• Manageability Appendix A.1 is incorrect and should be removed

  #357 opened 4 years ago by DavidSchinazi
  0

• Applicability: Trying to avoid confusion when read in future years

  #367 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  0

• Applicability: Add a cross ref to the network part in manageability?

  #368 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  0

• Manageability: PMTU

  #366 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  4

• Manageability: Is dropping intended to be random?

  #365 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  2

• Manageability: Not so trivial ACK detection for TCP

  #363 opened 4 years ago by gorryfair
  5