Backward search performance is terrible using :-/xxx
Closed this issue · 2 comments
tiancaiamao commented
In acme, you can use right click on:+/xxx to search string xxx, it search from the forward direction. There is also a :-/xxx to seach from the backward direction.
In acme, the backword search is basically the same with the forward search.
However, in edwood, :-/xxx is very slow, an order of magnitude slower than :+/xxx
paul-lalonde commented
That's the golang regexp library vs the hand-coded one in acme. This is
probably a strong enough argument to do regexp in edwood directly, though
that's at high engineering cost.
…On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, 9:11 PM tiancaiamao ***@***.***> wrote:
In acme, you can use right click on:+/xxx to search string xxx, it search
from the forward direction. There is also a :-/xxx to seach from the
backward direction.
In acme, the backword search is basically the same with the forward search.
However, in edwood, :-/xxx is very slow, an order of magnitude slower
than :+/xxx
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#398>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJ6RUFD3JOLCBMTIHYNLQTULNGATANCNFSM5HZS3USA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.