Y24-219 - Link tag groups with tag sets

[yoldas]

User story
As PSD, we would like to create TagSet records and link them with the existing TagGroup records.

Who are the primary contacts for this story
Abdullah, Andrew, Katy, Neil

Who is the nominated tester for UAT
PSD

Acceptance criteria
To be considered successful the solution must allow:

• In Sequencescape databases, of local, UAT, Training environments, extract a list tag groups that belong to single index tag sets and extract a list of pairs of tag groups that belong to dual index tag sets. [Obsolete; See the update below]
• Using record loader files, or rake tasks (whichever is suitable for the environment), create tag set records while linking them with the above. For example,
  • Single index tag group with name PN-1000212 Single Index Kit N, Set A can be linked with the tag set with the same name, while setting tag_group_id. [Obsolete; See the update below]
  • Dual index tag groups with names PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A (i7) and PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A (i5) can be linked with the tag set with the name without the specific index suffix PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A, while setting tag_group_id and tag2_group_id respectively.

Update after review session:

• Provide a way to link only the following tag groups for this story:
  • PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A
    • PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A (i7)
    • PN-1000215/PN-3000431 Dual Index Kit TT, Set A (i5)
  • PN-1000250 Dual Index Kit TN, Set A
    • PN-1000250 Dual Index Kit TN, Set A (i7)
    • PN-1000250 Dual Index Kit TN, Set A (i5)
  • PN-1000251 Dual Index Kit TS, Set A
    • PN-1000251 Dual Index Kit TS, Set A (i7)
    • PN-1000251 Dual Index Kit TS, Set A (i5)
• The solution or the approach should be simple and reusable, more will be linked later to support initial use. There is also a separate story for users to do these themselves already in the future.
• Create a new adapter type with name 'Dual Index' and assign the adapter types of both tag groups to this new adapter type; hence tag set shows the first as its own. [Obsolete; not needed for this story]

Dependencies
This story is blocked by the following dependencies:

• #4160
• #4236

References
This story has a non-blocking relationship with:
See links in the parent research story.

Additional context
Note that we are not renaming any existing tag groups; we are creating new tag sets and links to existing tag groups.

[KatyTaylor]

Ideally this would be done after #4239, so that no new tag groups can be created that don't have tag sets.

But probably doesn't matter too much because I don't think new tag groups are created v often.

[yoldas]

Ideally this would be done after #4239, so that no new tag groups can be created that don't have tag sets.

But probably doesn't matter too much because I don't think new tag groups are created v often.

I have added this story as a direct dependency in #4083 and sanger/limber#1814 with the same idea.

I had a similar assumption about new tag groups not being created often, which would require the SS tag creation story if done in UI. Record loader based additions for new tag sets and tag groups can be done easily in a similar way after this story I think.