Swift-blade is a macro powered dependency injection framework for Swift.
It is heavily inspired by Dagger.
Declare swift-blade as a dependency in your Package.swift
file:
.package(url: "https://github.com/shackley/swift-blade", from: "0.1.5")
Add Blade as a dependency to your target(s):
dependencies: [
.product(name: "Blade", package: "swift-blade")
]
We’ll demonstrate dependency injection with swift-blade by building a simple coffee maker. For complete sample code that you can compile and run, see swift-blade-example.
We'll start by defining a few types for our coffee maker.
Swift-blade utilizes initializers for dependency injection, so we'll start by writing our classes just like we would if we weren't using a dependency injection framework.
protocol Heater {}
protocol Pump {}
class ElectricHeater: Heater {
init() {}
}
class Thermosiphon: Pump {
private let heater: Heater
init(heater: Heater) {
self.heater = heater
}
}
class CoffeeMaker {
private let heater: Heater
private let pump: Pump
init(heater: Heater, pump: Pump) {
self.heater = heater
self.pump = pump
}
}
Swift-blade takes care of initializing instances of your application's classes and providing their dependencies.
In order to do so, swift-blade must be told how to obtain instances of each type that it encounters. This is where the @Provider
attribute comes in.
Let's go back in and add the @Provider
attribute to the initializers of our classes so that swift-blade knows how to obtain instances of them.”
Note
An initializer-based @Provider
must have its return type specified via the @Provider
attribute's of
parameter.
class ElectricHeater: Heater {
@Provider(of: ElectricHeater.self)
init() {}
}
class Thermosiphon: Pump {
private let heater: Heater
@Provider(of: Thermosiphon.self)
init(heater: Heater) {
self.heater = heater
}
}
class CoffeeMaker {
private let heater: Heater
private let pump: Pump
@Provider(of: CoffeeMaker.self)
init(heater: Heater, pump: Pump) {
self.heater = heater
self.pump = pump
}
}
Now swift-blade can obtain instances of type ElectricHeater
, Thermosiphon
, and CoffeeMaker
. However, it doesn't know how to satisfy dependencies of type Heater
and Pump
yet.
Since Heater
and Pump
are protocol types that can't be directly initialized, we'll define static @Provider
functions that declare how dependencies of these types should be satisfied.
Static @Provider
functions can have dependencies of their own. Since swift-blade knows how to obtain instances of type ElectricHeater
and Thermosiphon
, the providers for Heater
and Pump
can be written as:
@Provider
static func provideHeater(heater: ElectricHeater) -> Heater {
heater
}
@Provider
static func providePump(pump: Thermosiphon) -> Pump {
pump
}
This pattern is commonly used to alias a concrete type to a protocol that it conforms to.
All providers must be registered to a module. Modules are just empty enums that have the @Module
attribute.
Initializer-based @Provider
s are included in a module by specifying the provided type via the @Module
attribute's provides
parameter.
Static @Provider
s are embedded directly within a module.
@Module(provides: [ElectricHeater.self, Thermosiphon.self, CoffeeMaker.self])
public enum CoffeeModule {
@Provider
static func provideHeater(heater: ElectricHeater) -> Heater {
heater
}
@Provider
static func providePump(pump: Thermosiphon) -> Pump {
pump
}
}
The provider functions form a graph of types, linked by their dependencies.
graph LR;
CoffeeMaker-->Heater;
CoffeeMaker-->Pump;
Pump-->Thermosiphon;
Thermosiphon-->Heater;
Heater-->ElectricHeater;
To construct and access the graph, we'll first need to define its roots. That set is defined via a protocol with functions that have no arguments and return the root types.
By applying the @Component
attribute the protocol and declaring the modules that can used to provide dependencies, swift-blade then fully generates an implementation of the protocol.
@Component(modules = [CoffeeModule.self])
protocol CoffeeShop {
func maker() -> CoffeeMaker
}
The implementation has the same name as the protocol prefixed with "Blade". Now, our CoffeeApp
can simply use the generated implementation of CoffeeShop
to get a fully dependency-injected CoffeeMaker
!
@main
struct CoffeeApp {
static func main() {
let coffeeShop = BladeCoffeeShop()
let coffeeMaker = coffeeShop.maker()
}
}
See API Documentation for advanced usage.
Q: How is the dependency graph validated?
Unlike Dagger, a Blade component's dependency graph is validated at runtime immediately upon component initialization. If a dependency does not have a registered provider, a fatalError
will occur. This is largely due to the fact that the current macro implementation does not have context APIs that allow a macro to glean semantic information about types found in a delcaration at the time of expansion. If such an APIs were to be added, this validation could potentially occurr at compile time.
Q: Why do @Provider
s attached to initializers have to specify their provided type?
Currently, swift macros are not provided with any lexical scope information at the time of expansion, so it isn't possible for a @Provider
macro to know which type the initializer belongs to otherwise.