These codes provide an example about how to do Contract Test with PACT JVM Junit, which uses Junit in Consumer side and Gradle task in Provider side, it will cover:
- Microservices examples created with Spring Boot.
- Example of one Provider to two Consumers.
- Write Consumer tests in different ways including using Basic, Junit Rule and DSL method.
- Example of Provider State.
- Example of utilizing Pact Broker.
- PACT JVM Example
Clone the codes to your local, then you can find:
This is an API backend service which serves at http://localhost:8080/information, consumers can retrieve some person information by calling this endpoint with a query parameter name, to start the provider:
./gradlew :example-provider:bootRun
then call http://localhost:8080/information?name=Miku will get:
and call http://localhost:8080/information?name=Nanoha will get:
This is the first example consumer we called Miku, to start it:
./gradlew :example-consumer-miku:bootRun
then visit http://localhost:8081/miku in your browser, you can get this:
compare with Provider's payload and the information on the web page, you can find that the attributes salary
and
nationality
are not used by Miku.
This is the second example consumer we called Nanoha, to start it:
./gradlew :example-consumer-nanoha:bootRun
then visit http://localhost:8082/nanoha in your browser, you can get this:
similar to Miku, Nanoha does not use the attribute salary
neither but uses attribute nationality
, so this
is a little difference between the two consumers when consuming the response from the Provider's same endpoint.
Now, it's time to look into the tests.
This README will not go through all tests line by line, because the tests themselves are very simple and straightforward, so I will only point out some highlights for each test. For detailed explanation about the codes, please refer the official document
By the time this example is created, PACT JVM Junit provides 3 ways to write the pact test file at consumer side, the Basic Junit, the Junit Rule and Junit DSL.
PactBaseConsumerTest.java
public class PactBaseConsumerTest extends ConsumerPactTestMk2 {
@Override
@Pact(provider="ExampleProvider", consumer="BaseConsumer")
public RequestResponsePact createPact(PactDslWithProvider builder) {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
return builder
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Pact JVM example Pact interaction")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 45000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Hatsune Miku\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"hatsune.miku@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090950\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
}
@Override
protected String providerName() {
return "ExampleProvider";
}
@Override
protected String consumerName() {
return "BaseConsumer";
}
@Override
protected void runTest(MockServer mockServer) throws IOException {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
}
}
The ProviderHandler
is the same one used in consumer Miku, we just use it to do a self
integration test, the purpose for this is to check if consumer Miku can handle the mocked
response correctly, then ensure the Pact content created are just as we need before we send
it to Provider.
mockServer.getUrl()
can return the mock server's url, which is to be used in our handler.
PactJunitRuleTest.java
public class PactJunitRuleTest {
@Rule
public PactProviderRuleMk2 mockProvider = new PactProviderRuleMk2("ExampleProvider",this);
@Pact(consumer="JunitRuleConsumer")
public RequestResponsePact createPact(PactDslWithProvider builder) {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
return builder
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Pact JVM example Pact interaction")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 45000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Hatsune Miku\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"hatsune.miku@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090950\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
}
@Test
@PactVerification
public void runTest() {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockProvider.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
}
}
This test uses Junit Rule which can simplify the writing of test cases comparing with the Basic Junit.
PactJunitRuleMultipleInteractionsTest.java
public class PactJunitRuleMultipleInteractionsTest {
@Rule
public PactProviderRuleMk2 mockProvider = new PactProviderRuleMk2("ExampleProvider",this);
@Pact(consumer="JunitRuleMultipleInteractionsConsumer")
public RequestResponsePact createPact(PactDslWithProvider builder) {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
return builder
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Miku")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 45000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Hatsune Miku\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"hatsune.miku@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090950\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Nanoha")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Nanoha")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 80000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Takamachi Nanoha\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"takamachi.nanoha@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090940\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
}
@Test
@PactVerification()
public void runTest() {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockProvider.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockProvider.getUrl(), "Nanoha");
information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Takamachi Nanoha");
}
}
This case uses Junit Rule too, but with two interactions in one Pact file.
PactJunitDSLTest
public class PactJunitDSLTest {
private void checkResult(PactVerificationResult result) {
if (result instanceof PactVerificationResult.Error) {
throw new RuntimeException(((PactVerificationResult.Error)result).getError());
}
assertEquals(PactVerificationResult.Ok.INSTANCE, result);
}
@Test
public void testPact1() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("JunitDSLConsumer1")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Miku")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 45000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Hatsune Miku\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"hatsune.miku@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090950\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault();
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl(), "Miku");
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
});
checkResult(result);
}
@Test
public void testPact2() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("JunitDSLConsumer2")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Nanoha")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Nanoha")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{\n" +
" \"salary\": 80000,\n" +
" \"fullName\": \"Takamachi Nanoha\",\n" +
" \"nationality\": \"Japan\",\n" +
" \"contact\": {\n" +
" \"Email\": \"takamachi.nanoha@ariman.com\",\n" +
" \"Phone Number\": \"9090940\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault();
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl(), "Nanoha");
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Takamachi Nanoha");
});
checkResult(result);
}
}
Comparing with Basic Junit and Junit Rule usage, the DSL provides the ability to create multiple Pact files in one test class.
PactJunitDSLJsonBodyTest
public class PactJunitDSLJsonBodyTest {
PactSpecVersion pactSpecVersion;
private void checkResult(PactVerificationResult result) {
if (result instanceof PactVerificationResult.Error) {
throw new RuntimeException(((PactVerificationResult.Error)result).getError());
}
assertEquals(PactVerificationResult.Ok.INSTANCE, result);
}
@Test
public void testWithPactDSLJsonBody() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
DslPart body = new PactDslJsonBody()
.numberType("salary", 45000)
.stringType("fullName", "Hatsune Miku")
.stringType("nationality", "Japan")
.object("contact")
.stringValue("Email", "hatsune.miku@ariman.com")
.stringValue("Phone Number", "9090950")
.closeObject();
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("JunitDSLJsonBodyConsumer")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Miku")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body(body)
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault(this.pactSpecVersion.V3);
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
});
checkResult(result);
}
@Test
public void testWithLambdaDSLJsonBody() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
DslPart body = newJsonBody((root) -> {
root.numberValue("salary", 45000);
root.stringValue("fullName", "Hatsune Miku");
root.stringValue("nationality", "Japan");
root.object("contact", (contactObject) -> {
contactObject.stringMatcher("Email", ".*@ariman.com", "hatsune.miku@ariman.com");
contactObject.stringType("Phone Number", "9090950");
});
}).build();
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("JunitDSLLambdaJsonBodyConsumer")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Miku")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Miku")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body(body)
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault(this.pactSpecVersion.V3);
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Hatsune Miku");
});
checkResult(result);
}
}
When use Json Body in DSL usage, we can control the test accuracy by defining whether we check the response
body's attributes by Value or by Type, or even with Regular Expression. Comparing with normal Json body, the
Lambda statements can avoid using .close**()
methods to make the codes more clean. You can find more
description about it here.
Because we are using Junit, so to run the tests and create Pact files are very easy, just as what we always run our usual Unit Test:
./gradlew :example-consumer-miku:clean test
After that, you can find 7 JSON files created in folder Pacts\Miku
. These are the Pacts which contain the
contract between Miku and Provider, and these Pacts will be used to drive the Contract Test later at Provider
side.
The JSON files generated with task test
are in the local folder which are only reachable to our local Provider,
while for real project practice, it's highly recommended to use Pact Broker
to transport the Pacts between Consumers and Providers.
There's a
docker-compose.yml
file that aids setting up an instance of the Pact Broker. Rundocker-compose up
and you'll have a Broker running athttp://localhost/
. It'll set up an instance of PostgreSQL as well, but the data will be lost at every restart. In order to use it, inbuild.gradle
, setpactBrokerUrl
tohttp://localhost
and bothpactBrokerUsername
andpactBrokerPassword
to''
.
After you set up a Pact Broker server for your own, you can easily share your Pacts to the broker with the pactPublish
command:
./gradlew :example-consumer-miku:pactPublish
This command will upload your Pacts to the broker server:
> Task :example-consumer-miku:pactPublish
Publishing JunitDSLConsumer1-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing JunitDSLJsonBodyConsumer-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing JunitDSLLambdaJsonBodyConsumer-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing BaseConsumer-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing JunitRuleConsumer-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing JunitRuleMultipleInteractionsConsumer-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Publishing JunitDSLConsumer2-ExampleProvider.json ... HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Then you can find the Relationships in our Pact Broker
you can find their are '7' consumers to 1 provider, in real project, it should NOT like that, because we have only one consumer Miku here, it should be only 1 consumer to 1 provider, while in this example, making it's '7' is only to show that how Pact Broker can display the relationships beautifully.
Later, our Provider can fetch these Pacts from broker to drive the Contract Test.
We are using the Pact Gradle task in Provider side to run the Contract Test, which can be very easy without
writing any code, just execute the pactVerify
task. Before we run the test, make sure the Provider API is already started and running at our localhost.
Then we can run the test as:
./gradlew :example-provider:pactVerify
and you can find the test results at the command line, would be something likes:
Arimans-MacBook-Pro:pact-jvm-example ariman$ ./gradlew :example-provider:pactVerify
> Task :example-provider:pactVerify_ExampleProvider
Verifying a pact between Miku - Base contract and ExampleProvider
[Using File /Users/ariman/Workspace/Pacting/pact-jvm-example/Pacts/Miku/BaseConsumer-ExampleProvider.json]
Given
WARNING: State Change ignored as there is no stateChange URL
Consumer Miku
returns a response which
has status code 200 (OK)
includes headers
"Content-Type" with value "application/json;charset=UTF-8" (OK)
has a matching body (OK)
Given
WARNING: State Change ignored as there is no stateChange URL
Pact JVM example Pact interaction
returns a response which
has status code 200 (OK)
includes headers
"Content-Type" with value "application/json;charset=UTF-8" (OK)
has a matching body (OK)
...
Verifying a pact between JunitRuleMultipleInteractionsConsumer and ExampleProvider
[from Pact Broker https://ariman.pact.dius.com.au/pacts/provider/ExampleProvider/consumer/JunitRuleMultipleInteractionsConsumer/version/1.0.0]
Given
WARNING: State Change ignored as there is no stateChange URL
Miku
returns a response which
has status code 200 (OK)
includes headers
"Content-Type" with value "application/json;charset=UTF-8" (OK)
has a matching body (OK)
Given
WARNING: State Change ignored as there is no stateChange URL
Nanoha
returns a response which
has status code 200 (OK)
includes headers
"Content-Type" with value "application/json;charset=UTF-8" (OK)
has a matching body (OK)
You can find the tests checked the Pacts from both local and remote Pact Broker.
Since this example is open to all Pact learners, means everyone can upload their own Pacts to this Pact Broker, including correct and incorrect pacts, so don't be surprised if your tests run failed with the pacts from this Pact Broker. You can always upload correct pacts to the broker, but just don't rely on it, the pacts in this broker may be cleared at anytime for reset a clean environment.
Before we continue to Consumer Nanoha, let's look at the Gradle Configuration first:
project(':example-consumer-miku') {
...
test {
systemProperties['pact.rootDir'] = "$rootDir/Pacts/Miku"
}
pact {
publish {
pactDirectory = "$rootDir/Pacts/Miku"
pactBrokerUrl = mybrokerUrl
pactBrokerUsername = mybrokerUser
pactBrokerPassword = mybrokerPassword
}
}
...
}
project(':example-consumer-nanoha') {
...
test {
systemProperties['pact.rootDir'] = "$rootDir/Pacts/Nanoha"
}
...
}
import java.net.URL
project(':example-provider') {
...
pact {
serviceProviders {
ExampleProvider {
protocol = 'http'
host = 'localhost'
port = 8080
path = '/'
// Test Pacts from local Miku
hasPactWith('Miku - Base contract') {
pactSource = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Miku/BaseConsumer-ExampleProvider.json")
}
hasPactsWith('Miku - All contracts') {
pactFileLocation = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Miku")
}
// Test Pacts from Pact Broker
hasPactsFromPactBroker(mybrokerUrl, authentication: ['Basic', mybrokerUser, mybrokerPassword])
// Test Pacts from local Nanoha
// hasPactWith('Nanoha - With Nantionality') {
// pactSource = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Nanoha/ConsumerNanohaWithNationality-ExampleProvider.json")
// }
// hasPactWith('Nanoha - No Nantionality') {
// stateChangeUrl = new URL('http://localhost:8080/pactStateChange')
// pactSource = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Nanoha/ConsumerNanohaNoNationality-ExampleProvider.json")
// }
}
}
}
}
Here we have configuration separately for Consumer Nanoha, Consumer Miku and Provider.
-
systemProperties['pact.rootDir']
defines the path where consumer Miku and Nanoha generate their Pacts files locally. -
pact { ... }
defines the the Pact Broker URL and where to fetch pacts to upload to the broker. -
Then in Provider configuration,
hasPactWith()
andhasPactsWith()
specify the local path to find Pact files, andhasPactsFromPactBroker
specify the remote Pact Broker to fetch Pact files.
Why comment Nanoha's Pacts path? Because we haven't created Nanoha's Pacts, so it will raise exception with that configuration, we can uncomment that path later after we created the Nanoha's Pacts files.
The Contract Test between Nanoha and Provider is similar to Miku, the difference I want to demonstrate here is Provider State, you can find more detailed explanation about the Provider State here.
In our example Provider, the returned payload for both Miku and Nanoha have a property .nationality
, this kind
of properties values, in real project, could always be queried from database or dependency service, but in this
example, to simplify the Provider application logic, I just create a static property to simulate the data storage:
provider.ulti.Nationality
public class Nationality {
private static String nationality = "Japan";
public static String getNationality() {
return nationality;
}
public static void setNationality(String nationality) {
Nationality.nationality = nationality;
}
}
Then we can change the .nationality
value at anytime to achieve our test purpose. To change its value, I created
a PactController
which can accept and reset the state value by sending a POST to endpoint /pactStateChange
:
provider.PactController
@Profile("pact")
@RestController
public class PactController {
@RequestMapping(value = "/pactStateChange", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public void providerState(@RequestBody PactState body) {
switch (body.getState()) {
case "No nationality":
Nationality.setNationality(null);
System.out.println("Pact State Change >> remove nationality ...");
break;
case "Default nationality":
Nationality.setNationality("Japan");
System.out.println("Pact Sate Change >> set default nationality ...");
break;
}
}
}
Because this controller should only be available at Non-Production environment, so I added a Profile annotation to limit that this endpoint is only existing when Provider application is running with a "pact" profile, in another words, it only works in test environment.
So, to summary all above things, when Provider is running with a "pact" profile, it serves an endpoint /pactStateChange
which accept a POST request to set the .nationality
value to be "Japan" (by default) or "null".
The test cases at Nanoha side is using DSL Lambda, here we have two cases in our test, the main difference between
them is the expectation for .nationality
and the Provider State we set in .given()
.
public class NationalityPactTest {
PactSpecVersion pactSpecVersion;
private void checkResult(PactVerificationResult result) {
if (result instanceof PactVerificationResult.Error) {
throw new RuntimeException(((PactVerificationResult.Error)result).getError());
}
assertEquals(PactVerificationResult.Ok.INSTANCE, result);
}
@Test
public void testWithNationality() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
DslPart body = newJsonBody((root) -> {
root.numberType("salary");
root.stringValue("fullName", "Takamachi Nanoha");
root.stringValue("nationality", "Japan");
root.object("contact", (contactObject) -> {
contactObject.stringMatcher("Email", ".*@ariman.com", "takamachi.nanoha@ariman.com");
contactObject.stringType("Phone Number", "9090940");
});
}).build();
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("ConsumerNanohaWithNationality")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Nanoha")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Nanoha")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body(body)
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault(this.pactSpecVersion.V3);
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Takamachi Nanoha");
assertEquals(information.getNationality(), "Japan");
});
checkResult(result);
}
@Test
public void testNoNationality() {
Map<String, String> headers = new HashMap<String, String>();
headers.put("Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8");
DslPart body = newJsonBody((root) -> {
root.numberType("salary");
root.stringValue("fullName", "Takamachi Nanoha");
root.stringValue("nationality", null);
root.object("contact", (contactObject) -> {
contactObject.stringMatcher("Email", ".*@ariman.com", "takamachi.nanoha@ariman.com");
contactObject.stringType("Phone Number", "9090940");
});
}).build();
RequestResponsePact pact = ConsumerPactBuilder
.consumer("ConsumerNanohaNoNationality")
.hasPactWith("ExampleProvider")
.given("No nationality")
.uponReceiving("Query fullName is Nanoha")
.path("/information")
.query("fullName=Nanoha")
.method("GET")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body(body)
.toPact();
MockProviderConfig config = MockProviderConfig.createDefault(this.pactSpecVersion.V3);
PactVerificationResult result = runConsumerTest(pact, config, mockServer -> {
ProviderHandler providerHandler = new ProviderHandler();
providerHandler.setBackendURL(mockServer.getUrl());
Information information = providerHandler.getInformation();
assertEquals(information.getName(), "Takamachi Nanoha");
assertEquals(information.getNationality(), null);
});
checkResult(result);
}
}
To run the test:
./gradlew :example-consumer-nanoha:clean test
Then you can find two Pacts files generated at Pacts\Nanoha
.
As we mentioned above, before we running our test, we need start Provider application with profile "pact" (if your Provider application is already started when you ran test with Miku, please kill it first), the command is:
export SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE=pact
./gradlew :example-provider:bootRun
it's time to uncomment the Pacts file searching path in Provider configuration:
build.gralde
hasPactWith('Nanoha - With Nantionality') {
pactSource = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Nanoha/ConsumerNanohaWithNationality-ExampleProvider.json")
}
hasPactWith('Nanoha - No Nantionality') {
stateChangeUrl = new URL('http://localhost:8080/pactStateChange')
pactSource = file("$rootDir/Pacts/Nanoha/ConsumerNanohaNoNationality-ExampleProvider.json")
}
The first Pact will check the payload with default .nationality
which value is Japan
, while the second Pact, we
define a stateChangeUrl
which is implemented by PactController
in Provider as we talked above, and the POST body
is defined in .given()
in the Pact.
the same command as we did with Consumer Miku:
./gradlew :example-provider:pactVerify
Then you can get the test log in the same terminal.
Is everything done? Yes, if you followed all above introductions until here, you should be able to create your Contract Test by yourself. But before you go to real, let's try to break something to see how Pact could find the defect.
Both Miku and Nanoha consume Provider's response for a property .name
, in real project, there might be a case that
Provider would like to change this property name to .fullname
, this could be a classic Contract Breaking which would
be captured by Pact.
To do that, we need modify several lines of codes in Provider which could be a little difficult to understand, especially for a some testers who are not familiar to Spring Boot application.
So to make the breaking simple, let's just force Provider returns null
as the value to .name
to all consumers, this can be easily done by
adding only a single line:
provider.InformationController
@RestController
public class InformationController {
...
information.setName(null);
return information;
}
}
Restart your Provider application and run the test again, you can get the test failures as this:
...
Verifying a pact between Nanoha - No Nantionality and ExampleProvider
[Using File /Users/ariman/Workspace/Pacting/pact-jvm-example/Pacts/Nanoha/ConsumerNanohaNoNationality-ExampleProvider.json]
Given No nationality
Query name is Nanoha
returns a response which
has status code 200 (OK)
includes headers
"Content-Type" with value "application/json;charset=UTF-8" (OK)
has a matching body (FAILED)
Failures:
0) Verifying a pact between Miku - Base contract and ExampleProvider - Pact JVM example Pact interactionVerifying a pact between Miku - Base contract and ExampleProvider - Pact JVM example Pact interaction Given returns a response which has a matching body
$.name -> Expected 'Hatsune Miku' but received null
...