smartcontracts/shitdao

SIP #3: Make the tokens edible

Opened this issue · 10 comments

smartcontracts commented

Make the tokens edible

By Mitchfinn

Well if anyone can decipher what this means then we'll implement it.

qbzzt commented

In addition to function transfer(address _to, uint256 _amount), which lets you transfer tokens, have function feed(address _to, uint256 _amount). This function can have several results, chosen as randomly as possible next time the recipient attempts to transfer tokens.

  1. Normal, no special effects.
  2. Diarrhea, the next time the recipient attempts a transfer, it ends up being up to five times more than the intended amount.
  3. Constipation, any transfers by the recipient for the next 24 hours fail.
smartcontracts commented

@qbzzt wow that is so good. Do you think you can make a pull request with that behavior

smartcontracts commented

I'd like to have a "good" option so it's like gambling on whether or not to feed the contract

JTraversa commented

I think a euphemism around the ability to tell others to eat shit is the way to go here.

E.g. Allow one user to tell another to eat shit by allowing them to burn a proportional amount of their own tokens and their chosen user.

  function eatShit(address to, uint256 courics) public returns (bool) {
      require(to != address(0));
      
      _burn(to, courics);
      _burn(msg.sender, courics);
      
      return (true);
  }
qbzzt commented

@qbzzt wow that is so good. Do you think you can make a pull request with that behavior

I'll do it, but it might take me a while (life's slightly busy)

zac-williamson commented

@qbzzt I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty of implementing this.

I also added a positive outcome per @smartcontracts request. Feeding a user has a 25% chance of adding an additional 1 token to their balance.

qbzzt commented
zac-williamson commented

Mind? I prefer that. Life is a bit hectic. Anyway, what do you mean by one token? The equivalent of one wei? That is tiny, how about we multiply the balance by 1.25 instead?
…
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 1:31 PM Zachary James Williamson < @.***> wrote: @qbzzt https://github.com/qbzzt I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty of implementing this. I also added a positive outcome per @smartcontracts https://github.com/smartcontracts request. Feeding a user has a 25% chance of adding an additional 1 token to their balance. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBCGGOOELQFIRUWKOAN66LT7ETRVANCNFSM5C6TXPRQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

Aye 1 token is tiny. Thing is nothing onchain is truly random - if the balance was multiplied by 1.25 this would allow a user to arbitrarily increase their balance.

Although given this is shitDAO maybe that doesn't matter...

qbzzt commented
zac-williamson commented

Change the 25% from a minting to a transfer from the feeder. Then the abuse doesn't matter. If you're going to feed anybody shit, don't be surprised if there is a bad consequence to you too On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 5:21 PM Zachary James Williamson < @.> wrote:
…
Mind? I prefer that. Life is a bit hectic. Anyway, what do you mean by one token? The equivalent of one wei? That is tiny, how about we multiply the balance by 1.25 instead? … <#m_2102270948825513548_> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 1:31 PM Zachary James Williamson < @.> wrote: @qbzzt https://github.com/qbzzt https://github.com/qbzzt I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty of implementing this. I also added a positive outcome per @smartcontracts https://github.com/smartcontracts https://github.com/smartcontracts request. Feeding a user has a 25% chance of adding an additional 1 token to their balance. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment) <#4 (comment)>>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBCGGOOELQFIRUWKOAN66LT7ETRVANCNFSM5C6TXPRQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub . Aye 1 token is tiny. Thing is nothing onchain is truly random - if the balance was multiplied by 1.25 this would allow a user to arbitrarily increase their balance. Although given this is shitDAO maybe that doesn't matter... — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBCGGOOPIWGON7I4VNYQ7LT7FOOJANCNFSM5C6TXPRQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

Sounds good to me. Updated.