DB9 connector is wrongly named/pin 1 marked
TabajaraLabs opened this issue · 3 comments
TabajaraLabs commented
In DB9 connector, there is a DB9-male but not DB-9 female. Also, in DB-9 male, the square pin (which should be pin 1) is pin 5, leading to confusion. I modded the library for the correct position and created a pair of new DB9 connectors which are cut to be smaller (I use it a lot, and see it a lot on the net). Feel free to add to the main library.
GitRayman commented
I think I am seeing this too... the female DB9 is OK, but the male one is backwards...
Thanks for the file TabajaraLabs. Yours looks correct.
PaulZC commented
Hi @TabajaraLabs / @GitRayman ,
It has only taken us four years (!) but this issue has now been fixed - in this commit.
Thanks for identifying this problem,
Paul
TabajaraLabs commented
It happens, at least it was corrected =)
Em 03/07/2021 06:33, Paul escreveu:
… Hi @TabajaraLabs <https://github.com/TabajaraLabs> / @GitRayman
<https://github.com/GitRayman> ,
It has only taken us four years (!) but this issue has now been fixed -
in this commit
<093cbd3>.
Thanks for identifying this problem,
Paul
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#127 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEW5MH6D254GFSMPYAJSOGDTV3KOPANCNFSM4DXMEQAQ>.
--
---8<---Corte Aqui---8<---
https://www.tabalabs.com.br
https://tabajara-labs.blogspot.com