tc39/proposal-array-grouping

Issues

• Stage 4 Criteria

  #60 opened 7 months ago by ljharb
  7

• Request to reconsider `groupBy` as a prototype function

  #62 opened 8 months ago by thorhj
  6

• Why not let the user provide a second argument to control how the values accumulate against a key?

  #45 opened a year ago by sebinsua
  3

• Web Compatibility Issue: Sugar versions v0.9 through v1.3.9 (inclusive)

  #37 opened 2 years ago by codehag
  27

• Stage 3 Criteria

  #54 opened a year ago by ljharb
  10

• Static method naming

  #57 opened a year ago by acutmore
  11

• Subclassing

  #58 opened a year ago by zloirock
  7

• How about add `groupToArray` or `chunk`?

  #53 opened a year ago by yuhj86
  3

• Grouping via iterator methods?

  #51 opened a year ago by rauschma
  11

• Stage 4 Criteria

  #32 opened a year ago by jridgewell
  8

• We can define another parameter named `accumulator`

  #15 opened a year ago by aleen42
  10

• Supporing Records/Tuples and Maps

  #36 opened a year ago by jridgewell
  4

• Other lodash use cases where the method could be handy

  #17 opened a year ago by viktor-yakubiv
  1

• I still think Array#partition will be great as well

  #9 opened a year ago by MaxGraey
  31

• TypedArray support?

  #41 opened a year ago by hax
  1

• Consider alternative attachment on Object and Map

  #46 opened a year ago by eemeli
  3

• WebCompat regressions with `group`

  #44 opened a year ago by codehag
  37

• with target object

  #48 opened 2 years ago by wootra
  5

• How to convert an array of of objects to a hash?

  #50 opened 2 years ago by AjaxSolutions
  10

• How to convert array of of objects to a hash?

  #49 opened 2 years ago by AjaxSolutions
  2

• `group` and `groupToMap` why not merge into one api

  #43 opened 2 years ago by c0dedance
  6

• Should HasProperty be called, the same way Array.prototype.map calls it?

  #42 opened 2 years ago by marjakh
  3

• Add the new method names to Array.prototype [ @@unscopables ]

  #34 opened 2 years ago by legendecas
  0

• groupByMap naming

  #30 opened 3 years ago by ljharb
  30

• don't prefer Object over Map

  #33 opened 2 years ago by mfulton26
  21

• Maybe also have `groupByMap`?

  #3 opened 3 years ago by bakkot
  46

• Stage 3 Criteria

  #19 opened 3 years ago by jridgewell
  6

• `Array#groupBy...)` should take (value, index, array) as parameters

  #24 opened 3 years ago by AbdelrahmanHafez
  3

• Should arrays be created through Symbol.species?

  #4 opened 3 years ago by bakkot
  32

• Treatment of array holes?

  #6 opened 3 years ago by jridgewell
  5

• Typed arrays creation optimization

  #11 opened 3 years ago by zloirock
  2

• Types passed to callback

  #16 opened 3 years ago by waldemarhorwat
  2

• Should we create a null-prototype object?

  #13 opened 3 years ago by theScottyJam
  1

• Output an Object vs a Map

  #12 opened 3 years ago by bmeck
  2

• A polyfill

  #10 opened 3 years ago by Serrin
  4

• Design question

  #7 opened 3 years ago
  2