tc39/proposal-relative-indexing-method

Issues

• Get the last array element with array destructuring syntax

  #54 opened 3 years ago by MiroslavPetrik
  1

• Implementation status tracking

  #27 opened 4 years ago by rkirsling
  2

• [1,2,3,4].last(0) => 4; [1,2,3,4].last(1) => 3;

  #52 opened 3 years ago by ZhangSanDeHao
  1

• TypeScript typings?

  #51 opened 3 years ago by Semigradsky
  1

• Possible error suppression if the argument is not a number

  #50 opened 3 years ago by jfet97
  4

• What about assignation?

  #16 opened 4 years ago by drpicox
  6

• Web compatibility issue in bricklink.com with "at" method name

  #41 opened 4 years ago by Constellation
  17

• Should it really be Math.trunc(n) || 0

  #49 opened 3 years ago by kg
  1

• Need use cases

  #48 opened 3 years ago by jfbrennan
  11

• "Fine" polyfill

  #47 opened 3 years ago by taralx
  3

• DOM collection

  #46 opened 3 years ago by mfulton26
  1

• Add to `arguments` as well?

  #14 opened 3 years ago by tjcrowder
  14

• Assignability

  #45 opened 4 years ago by falsandtru
  4

• How about align o.at(expr) with o[expr]？

  #42 opened 4 years ago by zeldajay
  3

• [1,2,3].at('last') returns what?

  #40 opened 4 years ago by zeldajay
  8

• what the '7 more characters' are

  #38 opened 4 years ago by fayfang
  3

• How about `.get()` instead of `.at()`?

  #37 opened 4 years ago by rauschma
  9

• Stage 3 spec reviewers

  #19 opened 4 years ago by syg
  12

• can support callback also

  #35 opened 4 years ago by nkitku
  4

• How about `getItem()` and `setItem()`?

  #10 opened 4 years ago by rauschma
  8

• Array.prototype[@@unscopables]

  #30 opened 4 years ago by rkirsling
  0

• Naming proposal Array.prototype.itemAt()

  #33 opened 4 years ago by jboler
  24

• `item` on Strings has questionable value

  #20 opened 4 years ago by michaelficarra
  33

• Current plan given web incompat

  #34 opened 4 years ago by syg
  1

• Web compatibility issue with flickr.com (in YUI 3)

  #32 opened 4 years ago by jorendorff
  8

• Web compatibility issue with Magic360

  #28 opened 4 years ago by evilpie
  5

• Web compatibility issue with Yui2

  #31 opened 4 years ago by evilpie
  3

• What is “squooshgate”?

  #24 opened 4 years ago by ExE-Boss
  1

• Would allowing negative indices in square brackets really break existing code?

  #23 opened 4 years ago by rauschma
  0

• What if we use WebIDL algorithm for `item()` ?

  #3 opened 4 years ago by hax
  11

• Question about subclass claim in the readme

  #1 opened 4 years ago by ljharb
  5

• Polyfill is confusing

  #17 opened 4 years ago by evilpie
  4

• Please update status to Stage 2

  #8 opened 4 years ago by leobalter
  0

• Using `any` for the return type of `item` may incur a performance hit

  #7 opened 4 years ago by bzbarsky
  9

• Transfer to tc39-transfers

  #9 opened 4 years ago by syg
  1

• OOB behavior

  #11 opened 4 years ago by syg
  7

• Can we distinguish that item(..) either found a value at an index or not?

  #6 opened 4 years ago by getify
  22

• What rationale using "item" instead "at"?

  #2 opened 4 years ago by MaxGraey
  9