tc39/proposal-static-class-features

Issues

• Access from this should be supported

  #62 opened 5 years ago by earonesty
  5

• Handling of particular static properties in TypeScript

  #64 opened 5 years ago by about-code
  6

• Specification text for this proposal and class fields proposal is out of sync

  #67 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  2

• ClassDefinitionEvaluation does not correctly restore outerPrivateEnvironment.

  #68 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  3

• Missing static semantics for ClassElementKind for fields

  #69 opened 5 years ago by rbuckton
  1

• Missing changes for ClassFieldDefinitionEvaluation

  #38 opened 5 years ago by leobalter
  6

• Mention static private accessors?

  #61 opened 5 years ago by rauschma
  0

• Should we disallow static method definitions whose PropName is "prototype" or "constructor"?

  #60 opened 5 years ago by JLHwung
  3

• RS ClassDefinitionEvaluation, step 34.a. looks incorrect

  #57 opened 6 years ago by Andrew-Cottrell
  1

• Missing early error restriction for accessors with different placement, but same private name

  #48 opened 6 years ago by anba
  4

• Update the names to match clarifications in class fields

  #49 opened 7 years ago by tjcrowder
  7

• Static private member with same private name as a private instance member

  #47 opened 7 years ago by tjcrowder
  7

• Mention acorn support

  #39 opened 7 years ago by adrianheine
  0

• Request for use cases for static public fields

  #27 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  13

• Should only `function` be supported in classes, and not other lexical declarations?

  #17 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  18

• Replace lexically scoped functions in classes with private names defined outside of classes?

  #16 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  4

• What should be the scope that a lexical declaration is evaluated in?

  #13 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  3

• Should lexical declaration evaluation be before, after, or interleaved with static public fields?

  #12 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  32

• Which token is best for lexical declarations in a class declaration?

  #9 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  24

• Example of the utility of static private methods

  #4 opened 7 years ago by domenic
  70

• Is it OK that this repo merges static public fields, static private fields, and static private methods?

  #3 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  6

• Should private static fields or methods exist?

  #1 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  6

• Spec: Static private methods?

  #37 opened 7 years ago by rwaldron
  3

• Why do we disallow static fields named "constructor"?

  #35 opened 7 years ago by zenparsing
  3

• Is it excessive to have both private methods and lexically scoped functions in classes?

  #15 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  18

• Should class body lexical function declarations create const bindings?

  #20 opened 7 years ago by allenwb
  3

• Inheriting accessor-like semantics

  #24 opened 7 years ago by jridgewell
  29

• Impressions from the January 2018 TC39 meeting and next steps

  #25 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  0

• static inner class

  #34 opened 7 years ago by rahbari
  2

• Proposal incomplete?

  #30 opened 7 years ago by waldemarhorwat
  2

• Preference for `static {}` block to perform privileged static initialization

  #23 opened 7 years ago by rbuckton
  17

• Should static public fields be coupled with static private fields and methods?

  #28 opened 7 years ago by littledan
  11

• local lexical declarations should not be in scope for extends clause

  #21 opened 8 years ago by allenwb
  2

• Clarify in explainer that <placeholder> will be filled in with a token

  #14 opened 8 years ago by littledan
  0

• Expose static private fields only with decorators?

  #8 opened 8 years ago by littledan
  1

• static destructuring

  #6 opened 8 years ago by graingert
  7

• Static class field inheritance issues

  #5 opened 8 years ago by gibson042
  3

• Should static fields be created per subclass, or just in the superclass?

  #2 opened 8 years ago by littledan
  12