This repository is designed to allow projects seeking to join the CNCF as a 📦 Sandbox 📦 project to submit their applications. It is still a work in progress and we welcome PRs on this repo to automate assignments, improve the process, etc. If you have any questions, please reach out in the TOC Slack Channel or file an issue on the repo.
For information on the sandbox process please check out the details on our sandbox application process below.
Applying is as easy as 1-2-3!
- Open a new Sandbox Application using the linked issue form.
- Complete all sections of the form.
- Submit the issue.
Your project's application is placed in the backlog for triaging. You can view the status of your application and others at anytime by checking out our Project Board. When the TOC meets to review applications, more details on frequency here, your application will be pulled up and discussed. Your application may receive one of several statuses:
New- It is a brand new application and is in the backlog for an upcoming review.Approved- The application has been reviewed and been approved by the TOC. The issue will be closed.Declined- The application has been reviewed and been declined by the TOC. The comments on the issue will reflect the TOC decision and the issue will be closed.Need-Info- The application has been reviewed and requires more information in order for the TOC to further discuss the application. For instructions on what to do, please jump down to Need-Info.TAG-Assigned- The application has been reviewed and the TOC would like a TAG to review or consult with the project prior to further discussions. For instructions on what to do, please jump down to TAG-Assigned.Postponed- The application has been reviewed and the TOC has determined the project (as it exists at time of review) is not ready for inclusion within the CNCF. For instructions on what to do, please jump down to PostponedReturning- The application has been reviewed previously, was affixed aNeed-InfoorTAG-Assignedlabel, and that work has been completed and is ready for re-review. For instructions on what to do, please jump down to Returning.
Removing, updating, and adding labels as well as updating the project board are the responsibility of the TOC and CNCF staff.
The application is new and placed in the backlog.
The application has been approved.
The application has been declined.
If your project is assigned a Need-Info label, the TOC will comment on the issue with the specific additional information needed. It will then be placed in the Waiting status of the Project Board.
Please provide the additional information requested as a comment on the issue with links as appropriate. Once you have done this, please add the below text to your comment so the TOC and staff know to update the issue:
Completed info, project is Returning
This lets the TOC know the project is ready to be reviewed again. A TOC member or staff will remove the Need-Info label and affix Returning where it will then be removed from the Waiting status and placed in the Upcoming status for discussion at the next meeting.
If your project is assigned an TAG-Assigned label, the TOC will comment which TAG(s) and provide specific details on what is requested. The TAG Co-Chair(s) will be tagged on the issue. Depending on the details of the comment, the TAG or the project will update the issue with a comment containing any pertinent information. This may include links to a presentation recording, as summary of a discussion with the TAG, or recommendations.
Once a comment has been added, please add the below text to your comment so the TOC and staff know to update the issue:
Completed TAG review, project is Returning
This lets the TOC know the project is ready to be reviewed again. A TOC member or staff will remove the TAG-Assigned label and affix Returning where it will then be removed from the Waiting status and placed in the Upcoming status for discussion at the next meeting.
If the issue is affixed the TAG-Assigned label and you have been tagged on the issue as a TAG co-chair, please review the comments for the specific asks regarding the project. When completed, please provide a comment containing any pertinent information. This may include links to a presentation recording, as summary of a discussion with the TAG, or recommendations. Please work with the project to coorindate who will be updating the issue.
Once a comment has been added, please add the below text to your comment so the TOC and staff know to update the issue:
Completed TAG review, project is Returning
This lets the TOC know the project is ready to be reviewed again. A TOC member or staff will remove the TAG-Assigned label and affix Returning where it will then be removed from the Waiting status and placed in the Upcoming status for discussion at the next meeting.
If the issue has been affixed with the Postponed label it will be closed as the TOC has determined the project at the time of discussion is not ready for inclusion into the CNCF. There will be a comment on the issue that annotates the expectations in order for the project to be re-reviewed by the TOC. Depending on the status and details, there are a few options to be re-reviewed. For information on review ordering for postponed projects, plese refer to the Review Order section.
a. If the project has had substantial changes to the original information provided, open a new issue and link to the previous issue in the Additional information question (last question on the form). The project will be reviewed as if it were a new project applying but retain the historical context of the previous review to assist in evaluation.
b1. If the project has had no substantial changes, the originator of the issue may reopen it and provide a brief status update that addresses the TOC closure comments with a comment Revisit Ready. The TOC or staff will apply the Returning label and place the issue in the Upcoming status for discussion at the next meeting.
b2. If the individual seeking to reopen the issue is NOT the originator of the issue AND the project has had no substantial changes, provide a brief status update that addresses the TOC closure comments. The TOC or staff will reopen the issue and apply the Returning label and place the issue in the Upcoming status for discussion at the next meeting.
Issues affixed with the Returning label are placed in the Upcoming status on the Project Board for an updated discussion at the next Sandbox Application meeting.
The TOC reviews sandbox applications approximately every two months as of June 2020 in a non-public meeting; referred to as "session" hereafter.
The TOC attempts to work through approximately 7-10 applications per session. How many are actually reviewed in a session varies greatly between each session. Every project is unique and may warrant different areas of attention to be elevated for more in-depth discussion, depending on the nature and function of the project.
Each TOC member prepares for these sessions by performing an independent review of those projects scheduled for discussion at the next session prior to that session. They'll keep their notes on hand for when the project is up for discussion.
Sandbox applications are traditionally reviewed in a First In, First Out (FIFO) ordering as they appear on the 🏗 Upcoming Column of the Sandbox Application Board by their corresponding issue number. The only exception is where projects are Returning for review. Projects that are Returning are prioritized for re-review as they had previously been subject to a review and have completed their outstanding asks. In cases where a project was Postponed and has substantial changes since last review, a new issue is opened, linked to the previous, and reviewed as a new application. Refer to the Postponed label definition for more information.
Applications are moved from New to Upcoming approximately two weeks prior to the next scheduled session by the TOC or support staff.
During the course of the session, the TOC will actively discuss the project based on the information provided in the issue as well as other observations the TOC has about the project. Those observations vary greatly and may be subject to each TOC member's area of domain expertise, personal experience, community feedback, or other factors. During the course of active discussion, the TOC may identify areas the project needs to work on, complete, or allow to happen that could inhibit its acceptance into the CNCF. These areas will be captured succinctly and affixed the corresponding label (see Label statuses defined for more information). The issue will also receive a comment that details the additional areas that correspond with the label. The TOC comment may be formatted as a checklist or may be presented as text.
All project and organization names in the examples are fictional and are not intended to reflect any existing project past or present.
The TOC reviews and discusses Baggywrinkle. The TOC determines Baggywrinkle doesn't have sufficiently clear direction or indicators on what the project does or how it does it. The TOC concurs that Baggywrinkle should present at the correct TAG to gather input to improve the clarity of what the project does and improve the documentation on how it does it in a cloud native way. The TOC will summarize the two items that need completed on the issue as checkbox items, affix the Need-Info and TAG-Assigned label. The TAG chairs are then tagged on the issue by their GitHub handle. The application is then moved to the ⏲ Waiting Column of the Sandbox Application Board. Baggywrinkle then presents to the assigned TAG and incorporates their feedback into the project information and updates the application issue with a comment containing the requested clarity. They or the TAG may then check off the corresponding item, provide the Completed TAG review & info, project is Returning comment and the TOC or staff will remove the previous labels, affix the Returning label, and place the issue in the 🏗 Upcoming Column of the Sandbox Application Board so it is included at the next session.
The TOC reviews and discusses Isobars. The TOC determines that Isobars is a very early project; having existed less than 6 months, and doesn't appear to clearly decoupled from the sponsoring company's flagship product. The TOC affixes the Postponed label and comments on the issue the need for greater maturity, more distinguished separation of the project from the product, and an estimated timeframe to reopen the issue for re-review. The issue is then closed. The project maintainers work for several months to decouple the project from the product and during that time the project fills out its documentation, use cases, and begins growing its community. The maintainers then reopen the issue, edit the content of the issue to reflect the changes or comment with updates and add the comment Revisit Ready. The TOC or staff will add the Returning label and remove the Postponed label. Isobars is then placed on the 🏗 Upcoming Column of the Sandbox Application Board by the TOC or staff so it is included at the next session.
Once projects are accepted into the Sandbox, projects are subject to an Annual Review.