Error passing System.Uri between .NET 4.6.2 and .NET 8

[Leon99]

Just passing an instance of System.Uri between .NET 4.6.2 and .NET 8 processes gives this:

System.InvalidCastException: Object must implement IConvertible.
   at ServiceWire.Aspects.InterceptChannel.InvokeMethod(String metaData, Object[] parameters)

We found a possible reference to this issue in https://github.com/SubSonic-Core/SubSonic.Core.ServiceWire

implements additional typemapping so System.Uri can be mapped between framework and netcore runtimes

but that's an outdated fork, and it's unclear why that fix hasn't been merged here in 4 years.
Any ideas much appreciated.

[tylerje]

Is there a reason you don't want to just use a string? Much faster. No type serialization difference. The other option is a custom serializer.

…

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024, 6:52 PM Leon V ***@***.***> wrote: Just passing an instance of System.Uri between .NET 4.6.2 and .NET 8 processes gives this: System.InvalidCastException: Object must implement IConvertible. at ServiceWire.Aspects.InterceptChannel.InvokeMethod(String metaData, Object[] parameters) We found a possible reference to this issue in https://github.com/SubSonic-Core/SubSonic.Core.ServiceWire implements additional typemapping so System.Uri can be mapped between framework and netcore runtimes but that's an outdated fork, and it's unclear why that fix hasn't been merged here in 4 years. Any ideas much appreciated. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#92>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCDWVOOH7Q6PX2QOCLFFOTZVY7FTAVCNFSM6AAAAABN5UJG66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGUYTKMJXHE3DQMQ> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Leon99]

Thanks for the quick response @tylerje!

System.Uri can provide platform-specific representations of a URI, which is required in our case. Also, it helps to have compile-time certainty about the nature of a string. The workaround is to do serialization "manually", but I'd rather delegate that to the transport level. Could you give me some ideas about the custom serializer option?

[tylerje]

https://github.com/tylerjensen/ServiceWire/blob/fad14780853d5b51aa4896b900cb20aa297b0bac/src/Tests/Unit/ServiceWireTests/NpTests.cs#L51 Have a look at this test. https://github.com/tylerjensen/ServiceWire/blob/fad14780853d5b51aa4896b900cb20aa297b0bac/src/ServiceWire/Channel.cs#L16 And how the default serializer is used if one is not specified. https://github.com/tylerjensen/ServiceWire/blob/fad14780853d5b51aa4896b900cb20aa297b0bac/src/ServiceWire/DefaultSerializer.cs#L7 Make a copy of the default. Alter as you like, including different handling for a Uri type. And that should give you what you need.

…

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024, 9:40 PM Leon V ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for the quick response @tylerje <https://github.com/tylerje>! System.Uri can provide platform-specific representations of a URI, which is required in our case. Also, it helps to have compile-time certainty about the nature of a string. The workaround is to do serialization "manually", but I'd rather delegate that to the transport level. Could you give me some ideas about the custom serializer option? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#92 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCDWVJLGYLXOY5YZV4VHQDZVZS3NAVCNFSM6AAAAABN5UJG66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZZGU2DIOBRGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[tylerje]

Of course, you will need to inject your custom serializer in the client and host constructors. Test your serializer between the two runtimes, and Bob's your uncle.

[tylerje]

The reason I don't burden the default serializer with multiple type resolvers between multiple runtimes is there are far too many combinations and that would bloat the default to cover rare edge cases.